Assessing critical thinking in higher education: the HEIghten approach and preliminary validity evidence

被引:49
作者
Liu, Ou Lydia [1 ]
Mao, Liyang [2 ,5 ]
Frankel, Lois [3 ]
Xu, Jun [4 ]
机构
[1] Educ Testing Serv, Higher Educ, Princeton, NJ 08541 USA
[2] Educ Testing Serv, Higher Educ Res Grp, Princeton, NJ 08541 USA
[3] Educ Testing Serv, Assessment Dev Div, Higher Educ Grp, Princeton, NJ 08541 USA
[4] Educ Testing Serv, Ctr Data Anal Res, Princeton, NJ 08541 USA
[5] IXL Learning, San Mateo, CA USA
关键词
HEIghten critical thinking assessment; learning outcomes; higher education; validation; PERFORMANCE; MOTIVATION;
D O I
10.1080/02602938.2016.1168358
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Critical thinking is a learning outcome highly valued by higher education institutions and the workforce. The Educational Testing Service (ETS) has designed a next generation assessment, the HEIghten(TM) critical thinking assessment, to measure students' critical thinking skills in analytical and synthetic dimensions. This paper introduces the theoretical framework that guided the assessment design, and also reports on the preliminary validity evidence of the pilot data from over 3000 students from 35 two and four-year institutions. The critical thinking scores demonstrated satisfactory total and subscale reliabilities, were reasonably correlated with SAT scores, high school grade point average (GPA), and college GPA, and were able to detect cross-sectional performance difference between freshmen and seniors. In addition, most examinees reported having tried their best when taking the test. Results show that test-taking motivation has a significant impact on performance. We encourage institutions to pay attention to motivational issues in implementing low-stakes learning outcomes assessment such as the HEIghten critical thinking assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 694
页数:18
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
AAC&U (Association of American Colleges and Universities), 2011, LEAP VIS LEARN OUTC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, The Handbook of psychological testing
[3]  
Arum R., 2011, Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses
[4]  
Bondy K N, 2001, J Nurs Meas, V9, P309
[5]  
Braun H, 2011, TEACH COLL REC, V113, P2309
[6]  
Cohen J, 2013, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, DOI [10.4324/9780203771587, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587]
[7]  
College Board, 2014, TEST CHAR SAT REL DI
[8]   Role of test motivation in intelligence testing [J].
Duckworth, Angela Lee ;
Quinn, Patrick D. ;
Lynam, Donald R. ;
Loeber, Rolf ;
Stouthamer-Loeber, Magda .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2011, 108 (19) :7716-7720
[9]  
Facione N C, 1994, J Nurs Educ, V33, P345
[10]  
Facione P., 1990, CRITICAL THINKING ST, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.TSC.2009.07.002