Controlled blood sugar improves the eye's accommodative ability in type-1 diabetes

被引:6
作者
Abokyi, Samuel [1 ,2 ]
Ayerakwah, Patience Ansomah [1 ]
Abu, Sampson Listowell [3 ]
Abu, Emmanuel Kwasi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cape Coast, Coll Hlth & Allied Sci, Sch Allied Hlth Sci, Dept Optometry & Vis Sci, Cape Coast, Ghana
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Sch Optometry, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Birmingham, AL USA
关键词
REFRACTIVE CHANGES; INTENSIVE TREATMENT; INSULIN; COMPLICATIONS; HYPERGLYCEMIA; HYPEROPIA; AMPLITUDE; GLUCOSE; LENS;
D O I
10.1038/s41433-020-1058-y
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the impact of blood sugar level on ocular measures, including refractive error (RE), amplitude of accommodation (AoA), and lag of accommodation (LoA), in pre-presbyopes with type-1 diabetes. Method The fasting blood sugar (FBS) and ocular measures of type-1 diabetes patients (age: 14-39 years;n = 30) on insulin treatment was recorded while they fasted on two separate visits, at baseline and 3 months later. The AoA and LoA was measured with the appropriate spectacle correction worn. The Welch'st-test was used for comparison of the baseline measures between the normal FBS <= 7 (n = 10) and higher FBS > 7 (n = 20) patients, and the pairedt-test used to investigate for differences between the baseline and follow-up data in patients with changes in FBS. Results On average, the spectacle correction for the normal FBS group was marginally more myopic (RE: -0.30 +/- 0.67 D vs. +0.18 +/- 1.00 D,p = 0.032), and they showed greater AoA (5.38 +/- 1.08 D vs. 3.68 +/- 1.43 D,p < 0.001) and lower LoA (1.00 +/- 0.30 D vs. 1.30 +/- 0.38 D,p = 0.004) compared with the higher FBS group at baseline. On the follow-up visit attended by 25 patients, the FBS of 15 patients was reduced by an average of 7.0 mmol/L, 8 patients had an average increase of 5.2 mmol/L, while 2 patients recorded no changes relative to the baseline. The patients whose FBS was reduced showed improvement in the mean AoA from 3.78 +/- 1.58 D to 4.88 +/- 1.61 D (p < 0.001) and a reduction in the mean LoA from 1.37 +/- 0.40D to 0.87 +/- 0.19D (p < 0.001), whereas those with deteriorated control of the FBS showed an opposite trend. Conclusions Controlling hyperglycemia improves ocular accommodation in type-1 diabetes.
引用
收藏
页码:1198 / 1204
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Fasting Plasma Sugar: A Predictor of Accommodative Function in Diabetes [J].
Abokyi, Samuel ;
Ilechie, Alex ;
Asaam, Kwansema Adadzewa ;
Ntodie, Michael .
CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2016, 41 (06) :791-797
[2]   Amplitude of Accommodation in Type 1 Diabetes [J].
Adnan ;
Efron, Nathan ;
Mathur, Ankit ;
Edwards, Katie ;
Pritchard, Nicola ;
Suheimat, Marwan ;
Atchison, David A. .
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2014, 55 (10) :7014-7018
[3]   A comparison of the reliability of dynamic retinoscopy and subjective measurements of amplitude of accommodation [J].
Alvarez Leon, Alejandro ;
Milena Medrano, Sandra ;
Rosenfield, Mark .
OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2012, 32 (02) :133-141
[4]  
American Diabetes Association, 2015, Clin Diabetes, V33, P97, DOI 10.2337/diaclin.33.2.97
[5]   ACCOMMODATIVE AMPLITUDES IN THE EARLY TREATMENT DIABETIC-RETINOPATHY STUDY - EDTRS REPORT NUMBER-21 [J].
BRAUN, CI ;
BENSON, WE ;
REMALEY, NA ;
CHEW, EY ;
FERRIS, FL .
RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 1995, 15 (04) :275-281
[6]   THE LENS IN DIABETES [J].
BRON, AJ ;
SPARROW, J ;
BROWN, NAP ;
HARDING, JJ ;
BLAKYTNY, R .
EYE, 1993, 7 :260-275
[7]   Sources of error in clinical measurement of the amplitude of accommodation [J].
Burns, David H. ;
Atten, Peter M. ;
Edgar, David F. ;
Evans, Bruce J. W. .
JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY, 2020, 13 (01) :3-14
[8]  
Chung J.K., 2017, Frontiers in Laboratory Medicine, V1, P76, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.FLM.2017.06.002
[9]  
Duke-Elder W S, 1925, Br J Ophthalmol, V9, P167, DOI 10.1136/bjo.9.4.167
[10]  
Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus, 2003, DIABETES CARE S1, V26, pS5, DOI [10.2337/diacare.26.2007.s5, DOI 10.2337/DIACARE.26.2007.S5]