Contraception with two levonorgestrel rod implants -: A 5-year study in the United States and Dominican Republic

被引:38
作者
Sivin, I
Alvarez, F
Mishell, DR
Darney, P
Wan, LV
Brache, V
Lacarra, M
Klaisle, C
Stern, J
机构
[1] Populat Council, Ctr Biomed Res, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Univ So Calif, Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Ctr Family Planning Res, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] NYU, Sch Med, New York, NY 10012 USA
[5] Profamilia, Invest Biomed, Santo Domingo, Dominican Rep
关键词
levonorgestrel rod implants; effectiveness; removal ease; acceptability; side effects;
D O I
10.1016/S0010-7824(98)00112-7
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
A 5-year trial of a two-rod contraceptive implant, which releases the progestin levonorgestrel (LNG rod), was conducted at four clinics with 594 women. Mean age and weight at admission were 25.5 years and 62.4 kg, respectively. Consent to continue through 5 years was sought and obtained when the 3-year cumulative pregnancy rate proved to be 0.8 per 100. No pregnancies occurred in the fourth or fifth years. The 5-year cumulative pregnancy rate was, therefore, 0.8 per 100 with an annual average pregnancy rate below 2 per 1000 women. Prolonged bleeding/spotting (8.2 % of subjects) and irregular bleeding (5.6 %) were the most frequently cited medical reasons for removal. Removals for headache (4.7%) and weight change (4.0%) were the next most frequent medical reasons. Between 1 % and 2 % of subjects during the 5-year trial sought removals for each of the following conditions: mood changes, lower abdominal pain, depression, or pain at the implant site. The mean annual continuation rate during the study was 77 per 100. Use per woman averaged 2.96 years. Mean removal time was 5.9 +/- 0.6 min. These data indicate that, for a 5-year period, the two LNG rod implants are equivalent to the six Norplant(R) capsule implants with respect to safety and efficacy parameters, but permit easier and more rapid implant removal. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 282
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
BUCKSHEE K, 1993, CONTRACEPTION, V48, P120
[2]   A 5-YEAR CLINICAL-TRIAL OF LEVONORGESTREL SILASTIC IMPLANTS (NORPLANTTM) [J].
DIAZ, S ;
PAVEZ, M ;
MIRANDA, P ;
ROBERTSON, DN ;
SIVIN, I ;
CROXATTO, HB .
CONTRACEPTION, 1982, 25 (05) :447-456
[3]   A 5-YEAR EVALUATION OF NORPLANT(R)-II IMPLANTS IN CHINA [J].
GU, SJ ;
DU, MK ;
ZHANG, LD ;
LIU, YL ;
WANG, SH ;
IRVING, S .
CONTRACEPTION, 1994, 50 (01) :27-34
[4]   EFFECTIVENESS OF NORPLANT(R) IMPLANTS THROUGH 7 YEARS - A LARGE-SCALE STUDY IN CHINA [J].
GU, SJ ;
SIVIN, I ;
DU, MK ;
ZHANG, L ;
YING, LR ;
MENG, F ;
WU, SL ;
WANG, PZ ;
GAO, YL ;
HE, X ;
QI, LF ;
CHEN, CR ;
TIU, YP ;
WANG, D .
CONTRACEPTION, 1995, 52 (02) :99-103
[5]   PLASMA-LEVELS OF LEVONORGESTREL AND FREE LEVONORGESTREL INDEX IN WOMEN USING NORPLANT IMPLANTS OR 2 COVERED RODS (NORPLANT-2) [J].
OLSSON, SE ;
ODLIND, V ;
JOHANSSON, EDB ;
NORDSTROM, ML .
CONTRACEPTION, 1987, 35 (03) :215-228
[6]   The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: Findings from the US collaborative review of sterilization [J].
Peterson, HB ;
Xia, ZS ;
Hughes, JM ;
Wilcox, LS ;
Tylor, LR ;
Trussell, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 174 (04) :1161-1168
[7]   COMPARISON OF 3 DIFFERENT MODELS OF THE COPPER-T INTRA-UTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE [J].
ROY, S ;
CASAGRANDE, J ;
COOPER, DL ;
MISHELL, DR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1979, 134 (05) :568-574
[8]   THE SIGNIFICANCE OF BLEEDING PATTERNS IN NORPLANT IMPLANT USERS [J].
SHOUPE, D ;
MISHELL, DR ;
BOPP, BL ;
FIELDING, M .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1991, 77 (02) :256-260
[9]   ACCEPTABILITY OF NORPLANT(R)-2 RODS AS A METHOD OF FAMILY-PLANNING [J].
SINGH, K ;
VIEGAS, OAC ;
RATNAM, SS .
CONTRACEPTION, 1992, 45 (05) :453-461
[10]   ACCEPTABILITY OF NORPLANT IMPLANTS FOR FERTILITY REGULATION IN SINGAPORE [J].
SINGH, K ;
VIEGAS, OAC ;
FONG, YF ;
RATNAM, SS .
CONTRACEPTION, 1992, 45 (01) :39-47