Optimal Design of Low-Density SNP Arrays for Genomic Prediction: Algorithm and Applications

被引:26
|
作者
Wu, Xiao-Lin [1 ]
Xu, Jiaqi [1 ,2 ]
Feng, Guofei [1 ,2 ]
Wiggans, George R. [3 ]
Taylor, Jeremy F. [4 ]
He, Jun [5 ]
Qian, Changsong [6 ]
Qiu, Jiansheng [1 ]
Simpson, Barry [1 ]
Walker, Jeremy [1 ]
Bauck, Stewart [1 ]
机构
[1] GeneSeek, Bioinformat & Biostat, Lincoln, NE USA
[2] Univ Nebraska, Dept Stat, Lincoln, NE USA
[3] USDA ARS, Anim Genom & Improvement Lab, Beltsville, MD USA
[4] Univ Missouri, Div Anim Sci, Columbia, MO USA
[5] Hunan Agr Univ, Coll Anim Sci & Technol, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[6] Neogen Biosci Technol Shanghai Co Ltd, Mkt & Business Dev, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 09期
基金
美国农业部;
关键词
GENOTYPING ARRAY; MARKER PANELS; IMPUTATION; VALUES; CATTLE; ACCURACY; SUBSETS; CHIPS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0161719
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Low-density (LD) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays provide a cost-effective solution for genomic prediction and selection, but algorithms and computational tools are needed for the optimal design of LD SNP chips. A multiple-objective, local optimization (MOLO) algorithm was developed for design of optimal LD SNP chips that can be imputed accurately to medium-density (MD) or high-density (HD) SNP genotypes for genomic prediction. The objective function facilitates maximization of non-gap map length and system information for the SNP chip, and the latter is computed either as locus-averaged (LASE) or haplotype-averaged Shannon entropy (HASE) and adjusted for uniformity of the SNP distribution. HASE performed better than LASE with <= 1,000 SNPs, but required considerably more computing time. Nevertheless, the differences diminished when >5,000 SNPs were selected. Optimization was accomplished conditionally on the presence of SNPs that were obligated to each chromosome. The frame location of SNPs on a chip can be either uniform (evenly spaced) or non-uniform. For the latter design, a tunable empirical Beta distribution was used to guide location distribution of frame SNPs such that both ends of each chromosome were enriched with SNPs. The SNP distribution on each chromosome was finalized through the objective function that was locally and empirically maximized. This MOLO algorithm was capable of selecting a set of approximately evenly-spaced and highly-informative SNPs, which in turn led to increased imputation accuracy compared with selection solely of evenly-spaced SNPs. Imputation accuracy increased with LD chip size, and imputation error rate was extremely low for chips with >= 3,000 SNPs. Assuming that genotyping or imputation error occurs at random, imputation error rate can be viewed as the upper limit for genomic prediction error. Our results show that about 25% of imputation error rate was propagated to genomic prediction in an Angus population. The utility of this MOLO algorithm was also demonstrated in a real application, in which a 6K SNP panel was optimized
引用
收藏
页数:36
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Genomic prediction for growth using a low-density SNP panel in dromedary camels
    Morteza Bitaraf Sani
    Javad Zare Harofte
    Mohammad Hossein Banabazi
    Saeid Esmaeilkhanian
    Ali Shafei Naderi
    Nader Salim
    Abbas Teimoori
    Ahmad Bitaraf
    Mohammad Zadehrahmani
    Pamela Anna Burger
    Vincenzo Landi
    Mohammad Silawi
    Afsaneh Taghipour Sheshdeh
    Mohammad Ali Faghihi
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [2] Genomic prediction for growth using a low-density SNP panel in dromedary camels
    Sani, Morteza Bitaraf
    Harofte, Javad Zare
    Banabazi, Mohammad Hossein
    Esmaeilkhanian, Saeid
    Naderi, Ali Shafei
    Salim, Nader
    Teimoori, Abbas
    Bitaraf, Ahmad
    Zadehrahmani, Mohammad
    Burger, Pamela Anna
    Landi, Vincenzo
    Silawi, Mohammad
    Sheshdeh, Afsaneh Taghipour
    Faghihi, Mohammad Ali
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [3] Design of a low-density SNP chip for the main Australian sheep breeds and its effect on imputation and genomic prediction accuracy
    Bolormaa, S.
    Gore, K.
    van der Werf, J. H. J.
    Hayes, B. J.
    Daetwyler, H. D.
    ANIMAL GENETICS, 2015, 46 (05) : 544 - 556
  • [4] Improving accuracy of genomic prediction in Brangus cattle by adding animals with imputed low-density SNP genotypes
    Lopes, F. B.
    Wu, X. -L.
    Li, H.
    Xu, J.
    Perkins, T.
    Genho, J.
    Ferretti, R.
    Tait, R. G., Jr.
    Bauck, S.
    Rosa, G. J. M.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2018, 135 (01) : 14 - 27
  • [5] Low-density SNP markers with high prediction accuracy of genomic selection for bacterial wilt resistance in tomato
    Yeon, Jeyun
    Le, Ngoc Thi
    Heo, Jaehun
    Sim, Sung-Chur
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2024, 15
  • [6] Design of a Bovine Low-Density SNP Array Optimized for Imputation
    Boichard, Didier
    Chung, Hoyoung
    Dassonneville, Romain
    David, Xavier
    Eggen, Andre
    Fritz, Sebastien
    Gietzen, Kimberly J.
    Hayes, Ben J.
    Lawley, Cynthia T.
    Sonstegard, Tad S.
    Van Tassell, Curtis P.
    VanRaden, Paul M.
    Viaud-Martinez, Karine A.
    Wiggans, George R.
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (03):
  • [7] A low-density SNP genotyping panel for the accurate prediction of cattle breeds
    Reverter, Antonio
    Hudson, Nicholas J.
    McWilliam, Sean
    Alexandre, Pamela A.
    Li, Yutao
    Barlow, Robert
    Welti, Nina
    Daetwyler, Hans
    Porto-Neto, Laercio R.
    Dominik, Sonja
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 98 (11)
  • [8] Accuracy of genomic prediction using low-density marker panels
    Zhang, Z.
    Ding, X.
    Liu, J.
    Zhang, Q.
    de Koning, D. -J.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2011, 94 (07) : 3642 - 3650
  • [9] Using a very low-density SNP panel for genomic selection in a breeding program for sheep
    Jérôme Raoul
    Andrew A. Swan
    Jean-Michel Elsen
    Genetics Selection Evolution, 49
  • [10] Using a very low-density SNP panel for genomic selection in a breeding program for sheep
    Raoul, Jerome
    Swan, Andrew A.
    Elsen, Jean-Michel
    GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2017, 49 : 76