Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Vortioxetine for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder in Adults

被引:17
作者
Zhang, Xinyan [1 ]
Cai, Yuchun [1 ]
Hu, Xiaowen [1 ]
Lu, Christine Y. [2 ,3 ]
Nie, Xiaoyan [1 ,4 ]
Shi, Luwen [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Pharm Adm & Clin Pharm, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Populat Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Pilgrim Hlth Care Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Peking Univ, Int Res Ctr Med Adm, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
vortioxetine; major depressive disorder; adults; randomized controlled trials; meta-analysis; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIALS; CONTROLLED 8-WEEK TRIAL; 5 MG VORTIOXETINE; STAR-ASTERISK-D; DOUBLE-BLIND; LU AA21004; MG/DAY VORTIOXETINE; COGNITIVE FUNCTION; ACTIVE-REFERENCE; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyt.2022.922648
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: We aimed to compare the efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability of vortioxetine in the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) in adults. Method: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials (CENTRAL), and for randomized controlled trials that examined vortioxetine vs. placebo or other antidepressants for the treatment of MDD from database inception to August 30, 2021, using keywords Vortioxetine, Brintellix, Trintellix, LuAA21004, major depressive disorder, mood disorder, affective disorder, and MDD. We identified 789 publications after removing duplicates. After screening, 20 eligible randomized controlled trials were identified, of which 19 were included in the final meta-analysis. We included adults (aged 18 years and older) with a primary diagnosis of MDD. Two review authors independently selected the studies and extracted data. We extracted data on study characteristics, participant characteristics, intervention details and outcome measures in terms of efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability. Analyses were performed using random-effects models, and outcomes were pooled as risk ratios (RRs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs). Results: In total, 20 studies (8,547 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Vortioxetine outperformed the placebo in efficacy outcomes, including response (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.23-1.48; P < 0.001), remission (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.17-1.52; P < 0.001), and cognitive function (SMD 0.34, 95% CI 0.16-0.52; P = 0.0003). Compared with the serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), vortioxetine had better tolerability (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.86-0.94; P < 0.001) but no significant difference in response (RR 0.91, 95%CI 0.82-1.00; P = 0.06) or remission (RR: 0.99, 95% CI 0.81-1.20, P = 0.88). Vortioxetine had no difference in response (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.88-1.32; P = 0.46), remission (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.41-2.44; P = 1.00) comparing with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Conclusions: Vortioxetine is more advantageous over placebo in treating MDD among adults, but no significant difference compared to SNRIs and SSRIs in general.Systematic Review Registration, identifier: CRD42021278355.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, active reference study of Lu AA21004 in patients with major depressive disorder [J].
Alvarez, Enric ;
Perez, Victor ;
Dragheim, Marianne ;
Loft, Henrik ;
Artigas, Francesc .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2012, 15 (05) :589-600
[2]   The safety and tolerability of vortioxetine: Analysis of data from randomized placebo-controlled trials and open-label extension studies [J].
Baldwin, David S. ;
Chrones, Lambros ;
Florea, Ioana ;
Nielsen, Rebecca ;
Nomikos, George G. ;
Palo, William ;
Reines, Elin .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 30 (03) :242-252
[3]   A randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled, duloxetine-referenced, fixed-dose study of three dosages of Lu AA21004 in acute treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) [J].
Baldwin, David S. ;
Loft, Henrik ;
Dragheim, Marianne .
EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2012, 22 (07) :482-491
[4]   The effects of vortioxetine on cognitive performance in working patients with major depressive disorder: A short-term, randomized, double-blind, exploratory study [J].
Baune, Bernhard T. ;
Sluth, Lasse B. ;
Olsen, Christina K. .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2018, 229 :421-428
[5]   Comparison of vortioxetine and sertraline for treatment of major depressive disorder in elderly patients: A double-blind randomized trial [J].
Borhannejad, Firouzeh ;
Shariati, Behnam ;
Naderi, Sina ;
Shalbafan, Mohammadreza ;
Mortezaei, Amirhosein ;
Sahebolzamani, Erfan ;
Saeb, Atefe ;
Mortazavi, Seyyed Hosein ;
Kamalzadeh, Leila ;
Aqamolaei, Ali ;
Noorbala, Ahmad Ali ;
Namazi-Shabestari, Alireza ;
Akhondzadeh, Shahin .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 45 (04) :804-811
[6]   Efficacy and safety of vortioxetine (Lu AA21004), 15 and 20 mg/day: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, duloxetine-referenced study in the acute treatment of adult patients with major depressive disorder [J].
Boulenger, Jean-Philippe ;
Loft, Henrik ;
Olsen, Christina Kurre .
INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 29 (03) :138-149
[8]   An indirect comparison of the efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine and venlafaxine using placebo as the common comparator [J].
Coleman, Kristina A. ;
Xavier, Vanessa Y. ;
Palmer, Trish L. ;
Meaney, James V. ;
Radalj, Libby M. ;
Canny, Louise M. .
CNS SPECTRUMS, 2012, 17 (03) :131-141
[9]  
Daly EJ, 2010, ANN CLIN PSYCHIATRY, V22, P43
[10]   Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test [J].
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD ;
Schneider, M ;
Minder, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109) :629-634