Compressed natural gas bus safety: A quantitative risk assessment

被引:12
|
作者
Chamberlain, S [1 ]
Modarres, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Ctr Technol Risk Studies, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
CNG bus; CNG risk; fire risk; natural gas; risk comparison;
D O I
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00596.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This study assesses the fire safety risks associated with compressed natural gas (CNG) vehicle systems, comprising primarily a typical school bus and supporting fuel infrastructure. The study determines the sensitivity of the results to variations in component failure rates and consequences of fire events. The components and subsystems that contribute most to fire safety risk are determined. Finally, the results are compared to fire risks of the present generation of diesel-fueled school buses. Direct computation of the safety risks associated with diesel-powered vehicles is possible because these are mature technologies for which historical performance data are available. Because of limited experience, fatal accident data for CNG bus fleets are minimal. Therefore, this study uses the probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) approach to model and predict fire safety risk of CNG buses. Generic failure data, engineering judgments, and assumptions are used in this study. This study predicts the mean fire fatality risk for typical CNG buses as approximately 0.23 fatalities per 100-million miles for all people involved, including bus passengers. The study estimates mean values of 0.16 fatalities per 100-million miles for bus passengers only. Based on historical data, diesel school bus mean fire fatality risk is 0.091 and 0.0007 per 100-million miles for all people and bus passengers, respectively. One can therefore conclude that CNG buses are more prone to fire fatality risk by 2.5 times that of diesel buses, with the bus passengers being more at risk by over two orders of magnitude. The study estimates a mean fire risk frequency of 2.2 x 10(-5) fatalities/bus per year. The 5% and 95% uncertainty bounds are 9.1 x 10(-6) and 4.0 x 10(-5), respectively. The risk result was found to be affected most by failure rates of pressure relief valves, CNG cylinders, and fuel piping.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 387
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The advent of compressed natural gas
    Journal of Offshore Technology, 2003, 11 (03): : 12 - 13
  • [32] The Application of the Safety Assessment of Liquefied Petroleum Gas and Liquefied Natural Gas in The Safety Management
    Chen, Sining
    Duo, Yinquan
    Wei, Lijun
    THEORY AND PRACTICE OF RISK ANALYSIS AND CRISIS RESPONSE, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 501 - 506
  • [33] The future of the European natural gas market: A quantitative assessment
    Aguilera, Roberto F.
    ENERGY, 2010, 35 (08) : 3332 - 3339
  • [34] Risk analysis for the compressed natural gas (CNG) station explosion accident
    Sui Yanfei
    Luo Yong
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RISK MANAGEMENT & GLOBAL E-BUSINESS, VOLS I AND II, 2009, : 216 - 219
  • [35] Improved quantitative risk assessment of a natural gas pipeline considering high-consequence areas
    Yin, Yuanbo
    Yang, Hao
    Duan, Pengfei
    Li, Luling
    Zio, Enrico
    Liu, Cuiwei
    Li, Yuxing
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2022, 225
  • [36] Comparison study on qualitative and quantitative risk assessment methods for urban natural gas pipeline network
    Han, Z. Y.
    Weng, W. G.
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2011, 189 (1-2) : 509 - 518
  • [37] BN & CFD-based quantitative risk assessment of the natural gas explosion in utility tunnels
    Bai, Yiping
    Wu, Jiansong
    Sun, Yuxin
    Cai, Jitao
    Cao, Jiaojiao
    Pang, Lei
    JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2022, 80
  • [38] Performance assessment of direct injection stoichiometric and lean burn compressed natural gas engine over port fuel gasoline and compressed natural gas engine
    Sahoo, Sridhar
    Srivastava, Dhananjay Kumar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2024, 43 (01)
  • [39] Model for quantitative risk assessment on naturally ventilated metering-regulation stations for natural gas
    Bajcar, Tom
    Cimerman, Franc
    Sirok, Brane
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2014, 64 : 50 - 59
  • [40] INSTALLATION OF A 230 KV COMPRESSED GAS INSULATED BUS
    SUPPLEE, GW
    KYLE, RJ
    SNOW, RV
    BOLIN, PC
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER APPARATUS AND SYSTEMS, 1974, PA93 (01): : 349 - 353