Compressed natural gas bus safety: A quantitative risk assessment

被引:12
|
作者
Chamberlain, S [1 ]
Modarres, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Ctr Technol Risk Studies, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
CNG bus; CNG risk; fire risk; natural gas; risk comparison;
D O I
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00596.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This study assesses the fire safety risks associated with compressed natural gas (CNG) vehicle systems, comprising primarily a typical school bus and supporting fuel infrastructure. The study determines the sensitivity of the results to variations in component failure rates and consequences of fire events. The components and subsystems that contribute most to fire safety risk are determined. Finally, the results are compared to fire risks of the present generation of diesel-fueled school buses. Direct computation of the safety risks associated with diesel-powered vehicles is possible because these are mature technologies for which historical performance data are available. Because of limited experience, fatal accident data for CNG bus fleets are minimal. Therefore, this study uses the probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) approach to model and predict fire safety risk of CNG buses. Generic failure data, engineering judgments, and assumptions are used in this study. This study predicts the mean fire fatality risk for typical CNG buses as approximately 0.23 fatalities per 100-million miles for all people involved, including bus passengers. The study estimates mean values of 0.16 fatalities per 100-million miles for bus passengers only. Based on historical data, diesel school bus mean fire fatality risk is 0.091 and 0.0007 per 100-million miles for all people and bus passengers, respectively. One can therefore conclude that CNG buses are more prone to fire fatality risk by 2.5 times that of diesel buses, with the bus passengers being more at risk by over two orders of magnitude. The study estimates a mean fire risk frequency of 2.2 x 10(-5) fatalities/bus per year. The 5% and 95% uncertainty bounds are 9.1 x 10(-6) and 4.0 x 10(-5), respectively. The risk result was found to be affected most by failure rates of pressure relief valves, CNG cylinders, and fuel piping.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 387
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk-based technology method for the safety assessment of marine compressed natural gas fuel systems
    Wilcox, R
    Burrows, M
    Ghosh, S
    Ayyub, BM
    MARINE TECHNOLOGY AND SNAME NEWS, 2001, 38 (03): : 193 - 207
  • [2] A QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK FOR NATURAL GAS STORAGE WELLS
    Dessein, Thomas
    Ayton, Brent
    Fraser, Alex
    Smith, Shawn
    Shironishi, Mari
    Sera, Travis
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2022 14TH INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE, IPC2022, VOL 1, 2022,
  • [3] Quantitative risk assessment of the natural gas pipelines in upgraded areas
    Zhou Y.
    Zhang Z.
    Tian S.
    Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38 (02) : 112 - 118
  • [4] Body structure strength analysis on compressed natural gas city bus
    Wei, Jinqiao
    Jin, Xianlong
    Jixie Qiandu/Journal of Mechanical Strength, 2003, 25 (03):
  • [5] Evaluation of the economics of conversion to compressed natural gas for a municipal bus fleet
    Yang, Lin
    Tyner, Wallace E.
    Sarica, Kemal
    ENERGY SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2013, 1 (03): : 118 - 127
  • [6] Quantitative risk assessment of natural gas leakage and explosion in utility tunnel
    Shi Y.
    Yao Z.
    Yuan M.
    Xie C.
    Ding Y.
    Jianzhu Jiegou Xuebao/Journal of Building Structures, 2023, 44 (11): : 129 - 136
  • [7] A method of quantitative risk assessment for transmission pipeline carrying natural gas
    Jo, YD
    Ahn, BJ
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2005, 123 (1-3) : 1 - 12
  • [8] CONSIDERING ROADWAY TRAFFIC IN QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT FOR NATURAL GAS PIPELINES
    Lu, Dongliang
    Siraj, Tammeen
    Warhurst, Karen
    Dimitriadis, Konstantinos
    Towers, Matt
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2022 14TH INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE, IPC2022, VOL 1, 2022,
  • [9] Quantitative risk assessment of a natural gas pipeline in an underground utility tunnel
    Fang, Weipeng
    Wu, Jiansong
    Bai, Yiping
    Zhang, Laobing
    Reniers, Genserik
    PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2019, 38 (04)
  • [10] Experience of compressed natural gas bus operations in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    Balassiano, R
    White, P
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 1997, 2 (02) : 147 - 155