Frozen Embryo Transfer and Preeclampsia Risk

Worldwide, the use of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) has been steadily rising over recent years. With the continuous improvements in cryopreservation techniques and the growing practice of single embryo transfer, the proportion of frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles has been increasing, therefore raising concern about the safety of this ART technique to both mothers and infants. This review aims to summarize the current evidence regarding the risk of preeclampsia in singleton pregnancies achieved by autologous FET compared to fresh embryo transfer, and to discuss the influence of different protocols used for endometrium preparation in frozen cycles on the risk of this obstetric complication. Several studies have reported a higher risk of hypertensive disorders, including preeclampsia, in pregnancies following FET compared with fresh embryo transfer. Recently, artificial FET cycles, which preclude the development of a corpus luteum, were shown to be associated with an increased preeclampsia risk in comparison with natural and stimulated cycles. Importantly, no difference was found between FET in a modified natural cycle and spontaneous conception. It has been proposed that the absence of the corpus luteum in artificial cycles may, at least partly, contribute to the observed increased risk of preeclampsia. Indeed, the corpus luteum secretes vasoactive hormones, such as relaxin, which are not replaced in artificial cycles, thereby compromising maternal cardiovascular adaptations to pregnancy, resulting in an increased risk of preeclampsia. If these findings are confirmed by a randomized controlled trial, natural, modified natural or stimulated cycles might be preferred over artificial cycles in eligible patients. (C) 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.