Reciprocity and Burnout in Direct Care Staff

被引:22
作者
Rose, John [1 ]
Madurai, Teresa [1 ]
Thomas, Kate [1 ]
Duffy, Brigid [1 ,2 ]
Oyebode, Jan [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Psychol, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] Wolverhampton City Primary Care Trust, Wolverhampton, W Midlands, England
[3] Birmingham & Solihull Mental Hlth NHS Trust, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
Staff; Reciprocity; Burnout; Stress; Care; Organization; INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES; STRESS; PEOPLE; SERVICES; SATISFACTION; WORKING; QUESTIONNAIRE; MANAGEMENT; INEQUITY; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1002/cpp.688
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Understanding the perceptions of direct care staff of their reciprocal relationships at work and levels of burnout may help us improve not only their psychological health but also the service they provide. A cross-sectional survey was undertaken with direct care staff who worked with children, older people and people with intellectual disabilities in residential settings. Staffs were asked to report their levels of burnout and perceived reciprocity in the relationship they had with service users, other staff and the organisation they worked for. Significant relationships were found between some burnout and reciprocity measures. 'Under benefit' in relationships with service users, colleagues and the organization was related to emotional exhaustion. 'Under benefit' in organizational and staff relationships was related to increased depersonalization. Reciprocity is a potentially useful concept for understanding differences in relationships across a broad range of staff and use of the reciprocity questionnaire in this study allows for comparison between diverse groups. The importance of relationships with the employing organization is highlighted in this sample and suggests that burnout is not solely linked with lack of reciprocity in the caregiving relationship per se. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:455 / 462
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
ADAMS JS, 1965, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V2, P267
[2]  
Allen P., 1991, CARE STAFF TRANSITIO
[3]  
Bakker AB, 2000, J ORGAN BEHAV, V21, P425, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200006)21:4<425::AID-JOB21>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-#
[5]   Applying equity theory to staff working with individuals with intellectual disabilities [J].
Disley, Philip ;
Hatton, Chris ;
Dagnan, Dave .
JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL & DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY, 2009, 34 (01) :55-66
[6]  
Duffy B., 2009, DEMENTIA, V8, P515, DOI [DOI 10.1177/1471301209350285, 10.1177/1471301209350285]
[7]   Predictors of job satisfaction and burnout among the direct care staff of a community learning disability service [J].
Dyer, S ;
Quine, L .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 1998, 11 (04) :320-332
[8]   STAFF BURN-OUT [J].
FREUDENBERGER, HJ .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 1974, 30 (01) :159-165
[9]   Cognitive therapy and behavioural coping in the management of work- related stress: An intervention study [J].
Gardner, B ;
Rose, J ;
Mason, O ;
Tyler, P ;
Cushway, D .
WORK AND STRESS, 2005, 19 (02) :137-152
[10]   Measuring staff support in services for people with intellectual disability: the Staff Support and Satisfaction Questionnaire, Version 2 [J].
Harris, P ;
Rose, J .
JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2002, 46 :151-157