Household production in Chaco Canyon society

被引:31
作者
Hagstrum, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Museum New Mexico, Off Archaeol Studies, Santa Fe, NM 87504 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/2694317
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
The household is the most basic and flexible component of human social organization. It is through the household that we can understand the Chaco phenomenon from the point of view of agriculture and craft production. Households strive for autonomy and self-sufficiency and they spread themselves thin to meet basic subsistence requirements. As a result, scheduling of agricultural and ci-aft activities is critical to the success of the household. Craft technologies must be complementary with agricultural activities;for example, pottery may be made during the heat of the day when agricultural tasks are at a lull. The concept of intersecting technologies suggests that technical knowledge, resources, and labor may be shared among crafts and other activities. Chacoan households probably specialized in the production of different crafts including pottery, jewelry, basketry and other woven goods. Within the context of the Chaco regional system the mobilization of labor would have been through obligatory work assignments that complemented domestic autonomy in agricultural production and, as a result, would have been organized seasonally.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 55
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1991, ENGENDERING ARCHAEOL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1972, HOUSEHOLD FAMILY TIM
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, SMALLHOLDERS HOUSEHO, DOI DOI 10.1515/9781503622067
[4]  
Arnold D.E., 1985, CERAMIC THEORY CULTU
[5]  
BELOTE J, 1977, ANDEAN KINSHIP MARRI, V7, P106
[6]  
Bermann Mark., 1994, Lukurmata: Household Archaeology in Prehispanic Bolivia
[7]  
Brumfiel E. M., 1987, SPECIALIZATION EXCHA
[8]  
CAMERON C, 1997, CERAMICS LITHICS ORN, P531
[9]  
Costin C.L., 1991, ARCHAEOLOGICAL METHO, V3, P1
[10]   Standardization, labor investment, skill, and the organization of ceramic production in late Prehispanic Highland Peru [J].
Costin, CL ;
Hagstrum, MB .
AMERICAN ANTIQUITY, 1995, 60 (04) :619-639