Behavioral sensitization due to social defeat stress in mice: antagonism at mGluR5 and NMDA receptors

被引:57
作者
Yap, JJ
Covington, HE
Gale, MC
Datta, R
Miczek, KA
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Dept Neurosci, Medford, MA 02155 USA
[2] Tufts Univ, Dept Psychol, Medford, MA 02155 USA
[3] Tufts Univ, Dept Psychiat, Medford, MA 02155 USA
[4] Tufts Univ, Dept Pharmacol, Medford, MA 02155 USA
关键词
MPEP; mGluR5; glutamate; NMDA; dizocilpine; social stress; defeat; amphetamine; sensitization; mouse;
D O I
10.1007/s00213-004-2023-3
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Rationale: Repeated administration of psychostimulants progressively augments the behavioral response to and increases self-administration behavior of these drugs. Experience of repeated intermittent social defeat stress episodes also leads to a sensitized locomotor response following psychostimulant challenge. Both metabotropic and ionotropic glutamate receptors have been shown to be critical in the induction and expression of stimulant sensitization, but their role in sensitization due to social defeat stress remains unclear. Objective: We evaluated the role of mGluR5 and NMDA glutamate receptors in the development of amphetamine-induced and social defeat stress-induced sensitization, using the non-competitive mGluR5 antagonist, MPEP, and the non-competitive NMDA antagonist, dizocilpine (MK-801). Methods: In adult, male CFW mice, sensitization was induced by either ten daily injections of D-amphetamine (1 mg/kg) or ten daily brief episodes of social defeat. Mice were pretreated with MPEP (3 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg) or dizocilpine (0.1 mg/kg) prior to amphetamine injections. Mice subjected to social defeat were pretreated with MPEP (10 mg/kg) or dizocilpine (0.1 mg/kg). Ten days after induction, the expression of locomotor sensitization to amphetamine was determined. Results: The induction of sensitization due to social defeat stress was prevented by MPEP, yet MPEP did not inhibit the development of behavioral sensitization to amphetamine. Confirming and extending earlier results, dizocilpine pretreatment blocked both amphetamine-induced and stress-induced sensitization. Conclusions: These data indicate that behavioral sensitization to social defeat stress is dependent on mGluR5 receptors, whereas low-dose amphetamine sensitization may not be.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 239
页数:10
相关论文
共 107 条
[1]   DIFFERENTIAL EFFECT OF STRESS ON INVIVO DOPAMINE RELEASE IN STRIATUM, NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS, AND MEDIAL FRONTAL-CORTEX [J].
ABERCROMBIE, ED ;
KEEFE, KA ;
DIFRISCHIA, DS ;
ZIGMOND, MJ .
JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY, 1989, 52 (05) :1655-1658
[2]   INTERCHANGEABILITY OF STRESS AND AMPHETAMINE IN SENSITIZATION [J].
ANTELMAN, SM ;
EICHLER, AJ ;
BLACK, CA ;
KOCAN, D .
SCIENCE, 1980, 207 (4428) :329-331
[3]   ROLE OF ENDOGENOUS SUBSTANCE-P IN STRESS-INDUCED ACTIVATION OF MESOCORTICAL DOPAMINE NEURONS [J].
BANNON, MJ ;
ELLIOTT, PJ ;
ALPERT, JE ;
GOEDERT, M ;
IVERSEN, SD ;
IVERSEN, LL .
NATURE, 1983, 306 (5945) :791-792
[4]  
Benquet P, 2002, J NEUROSCI, V22, P9679
[5]   Stimulation of the ventral subiculum of the hippocampus evokes glutamate receptor-mediated changes in dopamine efflux in the rat nucleus accumbens [J].
Blaha, CD ;
Yang, CR ;
Floresco, SB ;
Barr, AM ;
Phillips, AG .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1997, 9 (05) :902-911
[6]  
BLEAKMAN D, 1992, MOL PHARMACOL, V42, P192
[7]   Reduced stress-induced hyperthermia in mGluR5 knockout mice [J].
Brodkin, J ;
Bradbury, M ;
Busse, C ;
Warren, N ;
Bristow, LJ ;
Varney, MA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 16 (11) :2241-2244
[8]   EVIDENCE OF A COMPLETE INDEPENDENCE OF THE NEUROBIOLOGICAL SUBSTRATES FOR THE INDUCTION AND EXPRESSION OF BEHAVIORAL SENSITIZATION TO AMPHETAMINE [J].
CADOR, M ;
BJIJOU, Y ;
STINUS, L .
NEUROSCIENCE, 1995, 65 (02) :385-395
[9]   MODULATION OF THE LOCOMOTOR RESPONSE TO AMPHETAMINE BY CORTICOSTERONE [J].
CADOR, M ;
DULLUC, J ;
MORMEDE, P .
NEUROSCIENCE, 1993, 56 (04) :981-988
[10]  
CAMPBELL UC, 2004, PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY