Atomistic Simulations of Graphene Growth: From Kinetics to Mechanism

被引:33
|
作者
Qiu, Zongyang [1 ]
Li, Pai [1 ]
Li, Zhenyu [1 ]
Yang, Jinlong [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Hefei Natl Lab Phys Sci Microscale, Hefei 230026, Anhui, Peoples R China
关键词
CHEMICAL-VAPOR-DEPOSITION; LOW-TEMPERATURE GROWTH; EPITAXIAL GRAPHENE; HYDROGEN; CARBON; DYNAMICS; EDGE; 1ST-PRINCIPLES; MORPHOLOGY; CU(111);
D O I
10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00592
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
CONSPECTUS: Epitaxial growth is a promising strategy to produce high-quality graphene samples. At the same time, this method has great flexibility for industrial scale-up. To optimize growth protocols, it is essential to understand the underlying growth mechanisms. This is, however, very challenging, as the growth process is complicated and involves many elementary steps. Experimentally, atomic-scale in situ characterization methods are generally not feasible at the high temperature of graphene growth. Therefore, kinetics is the main experimental information to study growth mechanisms. Theoretically, first-principles calculations routinely provide atomic structures and energetics but have a stringent limit on the accessible spatial and time scales. Such gap between experiment and theory can be bridged by atomistic simulations using first-principles atomic details as input and providing the overall growth kinetics, which can be directly compared with experiment, as output. Typically, system-specific approximations should be applied to make such simulations computationally feasible. By feeding kinetic Monte Carlo (kMC) simulations with first-principles parameters, we can directly simulate the graphene growth process and thus understand the growth mechanisms. Our simulations suggest that the carbon dimer is the dominant feeding species in the epitaxial growth of graphene on both Cu(111) and Cu(100) surfaces, which enables us to understand why the reaction is diffusion limited on Cu(111) but attachment limited on Cu(100). When hydrogen is explicitly considered in the simulation, the central role hydrogen plays in graphene growth is revealed, which solves the long-standing puzzle into why H-2 should be fed in the chemical vapor deposition of graphene. The simulation results can be directly compared with the experimental kinetic data, if available. Our kMC simulations reproduce the experimentally observed quintic-like behavior of graphene growth on Ir(111). By checking the simulation results, we find that such nonlinearity is caused by lattice mismatch, and the induced growth front inhomogeneity can be universally used to predict growth behaviors in other heteroepitaxial systems. Notably, although experimental kinetics usually gives useful insight into atomic mechanisms, it can sometimes be misleading. Such pitfalls can be avoided via atomistic simulations, as demonstrated in our study of the graphene etching process. Growth protocols can be designed theoretically with computational kinetic and mechanistic information. By contrasting the different activation energies involved in an atom-exchange-based carbon penetration process for monolayer and bilayer graphene, we propose a three-step strategy to grow high-quality bilayer graphene. Based on first-principles parameters, a kinetic pathway toward the high-density, ordered N doping of epitaxial graphene on Cu(111) using a C5NCl5 precursor is also identified. These studies demonstrate that atomistic simulations can unambiguously produce or reproduce the kinetic information on graphene growth, which is pivotal to understanding the growth mechanism and designing better growth protocols. A similar strategy can be used in growth mechanism studies of other two-dimensional atomic crystals.
引用
收藏
页码:728 / 735
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Atomistic simulations of graphene origami: Dynamics and kinetics
    张盼盼
    贾海洪
    张艳芳
    杜世萱
    ChinesePhysicsB, 2023, 32 (08) : 100 - 106
  • [2] Atomistic simulations of graphene origami: Dynamics and kinetics
    Zhang, Panpan
    Jia, Haihong
    Zhang, Yan-Fang
    Du, Shixuan
    CHINESE PHYSICS B, 2023, 32 (08)
  • [3] Atomistic Simulations of Nonequilibrium Crystal-Growth Kinetics from Alloy Melts
    Yang, Yang
    Humadi, Harith
    Buta, Dorel
    Laird, Brian B.
    Sun, Deyan
    Hoyt, Jeffrey J.
    Asta, Mark
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2011, 107 (02)
  • [4] Chemisorption of hydrogen on graphene: insights from atomistic simulations
    Zhang, Junjie
    Yan, Yongda
    Zong, Wenjun
    Li, Aowen
    Qiao, Zhen
    Sun, Tao
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-CONDENSED MATTER, 2017, 29 (19)
  • [5] Mechanical mutability of polycrystalline graphene from atomistic simulations
    Liu, Te-Huan
    Pao, Chun-Wei
    Chang, Chien-Cheng
    COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2014, 91 : 56 - 61
  • [6] Protein folding kinetics and thermodynamics from atomistic simulations
    van der Spoel, David
    Seibert, M. Marvin
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2006, 96 (23)
  • [7] Mechanism and kinetics of sodium diffusion in Na-feldspar from neural network based atomistic simulations
    Gorfer, Alexander
    Abart, Rainer
    Dellago, Christoph
    ACTA MATERIALIA, 2025, 286
  • [8] Kinetics of rapid crystal growth: phase field theory versus atomistic simulations
    Galenko, P. K.
    Salhoumi, A.
    Ankudinov, V.
    JOINT 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN SOLIDIFICATION PROCESSES (ICASP-5) & 5TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CUTTING EDGE OF COMPUTER SIMULATION OF SOLIDIFICATION, CASTING AND REFINING (CSSCR-5), 2019, 529
  • [9] Scaling properties of flexible membranes from atomistic simulations: Application to graphene
    Los, J. H.
    Katsnelson, M. I.
    Yazyev, O. V.
    Zakharchenko, K. V.
    Fasolino, A.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2009, 80 (12)
  • [10] Atomistic simulations of the sliding friction of graphene flakes
    F. Bonelli
    N. Manini
    E. Cadelano
    L. Colombo
    The European Physical Journal B, 2009, 70 : 449 - 459