Protocol-the RAMESES II study: developing guidance and reporting standards for realist evaluation

被引:97
作者
Greenhalgh, Trisha [1 ]
Wong, Geoff [1 ]
Jagosh, Justin [2 ]
Greenhalgh, Joanne [3 ]
Manzano, Ana [3 ]
Westhorp, Gill [4 ]
Pawson, Ray [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Ctr Adv Realist Evaluat & Synth CARES, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
[3] Univ Leeds, Sociol & Social Policy, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Community Matters Pty Ltd, Woodside, SA, Australia
关键词
COMPLEX INTERVENTIONS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; DELPHI; METHODOLOGY;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008567
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Realist evaluation is an increasingly popular methodology in health services research. For realist evaluations (RE) this project aims to: develop quality and reporting standards and training materials; build capacity for undertaking and critically evaluating them; produce resources and training materials for lay participants, and those seeking to involve them. Methods: To achieve our aims, we will: (1) Establish management and governance infrastructure; (2) Recruit an interdisciplinary Delphi panel of 35 participants with diverse relevant experience of RE; (3) Summarise current literature and expert opinion on best practice in RE; (4) Run an online Delphi panel to generate and refine items for quality and reporting standards; (5) Capture 'real world' experiences and challenges of RE-for example, by providing ongoing support to realist evaluations, hosting the RAMESES JISCmail list on realist research, and feeding problems and insights from these into the deliberations of the Delphi panel; (6) Produce quality and reporting standards; (7) Collate examples of the learning and training needs of researchers, students, reviewers and lay members in relation to RE; (8) Develop, deliver and evaluate training materials for RE and deliver training workshops; and (9) Develop and evaluate information and resources for patients and other lay participants in RE (eg, draft template information sheets and model consent forms) and; (10) Disseminate training materials and other resources. Planned outputs: (1) Quality and reporting standards and training materials for RE. (2) Methodological support for RE. (3) Increase in capacity to support and evaluate RE. (4) Accessible, plain-English resources for patients and the public participating in RE. Discussion: The realist evaluation is a relatively new approach to evaluation and its overall place in the is not yet fully established. As with all primary research approaches, guidance on quality assurance and uniform reporting is an important step towards improving quality and consistency.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, EVIDENCE BASED POLIC
[2]   Towards a methodology for cluster searching to provide conceptual and contextual "richness" for systematic reviews of complex interventions: case study (CLUSTER) [J].
Booth, Andrew ;
Harris, Janet ;
Croot, Elizabeth ;
Springett, Jane ;
Campbell, Fiona ;
Wilkins, Emma .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2013, 13
[3]   Development of review criteria for assessing the quality of management of stable angina, adult asthma, and non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus in, general practice [J].
Campbell, SM ;
Roland, MO ;
Shekelle, PG ;
Cantrill, JA ;
Buetow, SA ;
Cragg, DK .
QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1999, 8 (01) :6-15
[4]   What's in a mechanism? Development of a key concept in realist evaluation [J].
Dalkin, Sonia Michelle ;
Greenhalgh, Joanne ;
Jones, Diana ;
Cunningham, Bill ;
Lhussier, Monique .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2015, 10
[5]   Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources [J].
Greenhalgh, T ;
Peacock, R .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 331 (7524) :1064-1065
[6]   Collecting stories: is it research? Is it good research? Preliminary guidance based on a Delphi study [J].
Greenhalgh, Trisha ;
Wengraf, Tom .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2008, 42 (03) :242-247
[7]   Realist review to understand the efficacy of school feeding programmes [J].
Greenhalgh, Trisha ;
Kristjansson, Elizabeth ;
Robinson, Vivian .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 335 (7625) :858-861
[8]   Protocol - realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) [J].
Greenhalgh, Trisha ;
Wong, Geoff ;
Westhorp, Gill ;
Pawson, Ray .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2011, 11
[9]   How Do You Modernize a Health Service? A Realist Evaluation of Whole-Scale Transformation in London [J].
Greenhalgh, Trisha ;
Humphrey, Charlotte ;
Hughes, Jane ;
Macfarlane, Fraser ;
Butler, Ceri ;
Pawson, Ray .
MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2009, 87 (02) :391-416
[10]   Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique [J].
Hasson, F ;
Keeney, S ;
McKenna, H .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2000, 32 (04) :1008-1015