Sparsity reconstruction in electrical impedance tomography: An experimental evaluation

被引:69
作者
Gehre, Matthias [3 ]
Kluth, Tobias [3 ]
Lipponen, Antti [4 ]
Jin, Bangti [1 ,2 ]
Seppanen, Aku [4 ]
Kaipio, Jari P. [4 ,5 ]
Maass, Peter [3 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Math, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Inst Appl Math & Computat Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Univ Bremen, Ctr Ind Math, D-28334 Bremen, Germany
[4] Univ Eastern Finland, Dept Math & Phys, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland
[5] Univ Auckland, Dept Math, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Electrical impedance tomography; Sparsity reconstruction; Tikhonov regularization; CURRENT COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; TIKHONOV REGULARIZATION; VARIATIONAL REGULARIZATION; PRIOR INFORMATION; ELECTRODE MODELS; INVERSE PROBLEMS; CONSTRAINTS; ALGORITHMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cam.2011.09.035
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
We investigate the potential of sparsity constraints in the electrical impedance tomography (EIT) inverse problem of inferring the distributed conductivity based on boundary potential measurements. In sparsity reconstruction, inhomogeneities of the conductivity are a priori assumed to be sparse with respect to a certain basis. This prior information is incorporated into a Tikhonov-type functional by including a sparsity-promoting l(1)-penalty term. The functional is minimized with an iterative soft shrinkage-type algorithm. In this paper, the feasibility of the sparsity reconstruction approach is evaluated by experimental data from water tank measurements. The reconstructions are computed both with sparsity constraints and with a more conventional smoothness regularization approach. The results verify that the adoption of l(-1)-type constraints can enhance the quality of EIT reconstructions: in most of the test cases the reconstructions with sparsity constraints are both qualitatively and quantitatively more feasible than that with the smoothness constraint. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2126 / 2136
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2002, COMPUTATIONAL METHOD
  • [2] APPLIED POTENTIAL TOMOGRAPHY
    BARBER, DC
    BROWN, BH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICS E-SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1984, 17 (09): : 723 - 733
  • [3] 2-POINT STEP SIZE GRADIENT METHODS
    BARZILAI, J
    BORWEIN, JM
    [J]. IMA JOURNAL OF NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, 1988, 8 (01) : 141 - 148
  • [4] A generalized conditional gradient method for nonlinear operator equations with sparsity constraints
    Bonesky, Thomas
    Bredies, Kristian
    Lorenz, Dirk A.
    Maass, Peter
    [J]. INVERSE PROBLEMS, 2007, 23 (05) : 2041 - 2058
  • [5] Electrical impedance tomography
    Borcea, L
    [J]. INVERSE PROBLEMS, 2002, 18 (06) : R99 - R136
  • [6] In Vivo Impedance Imaging With Total Variation Regularization
    Borsic, Andrea
    Graham, Brad M.
    Adler, Andy
    Lionheart, William R. B.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2010, 29 (01) : 44 - 54
  • [7] A generalized conditional gradient method and its connection to an iterative shrinkage method
    Bredies, Kristian
    Lorenz, Dirk A.
    Maass, Peter
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL OPTIMIZATION AND APPLICATIONS, 2009, 42 (02) : 173 - 193
  • [8] Mineshaft imaging using surface and crosshole 3D electrical resistivity tomography: A case history from the East Pennine Coalfield, UK
    Chambers, Jonathan E.
    Wilkinson, Paul B.
    Weller, Alan L.
    Meldrum, Philip I.
    Gilvy, Richard D.
    Caunt, Simon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2007, 62 (04) : 324 - 337
  • [9] Electrical impedance tomography
    Cheney, M
    Isaacson, D
    Newell, JC
    [J]. SIAM REVIEW, 1999, 41 (01) : 85 - 101
  • [10] Cheney M, 1990, Int J Imaging Syst Technol, V2, P66, DOI 10.1002/ima.1850020203