Effect of the size reduction on the bulk tensile and double cantilever beam specimens used in cohesive zone models

被引:16
作者
Costa, M. [1 ]
Viana, G. [1 ]
Canto, C.
da Silva, L. F. M. [2 ]
Banea, M. D. [2 ]
Chaves, F. [1 ]
Campilho, R. D. S. G. [3 ]
Fernandes, A. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] INEGI Polo FEUP, Rua Dr Roberto Frias, Oporto, Portugal
[2] FEUP, Dept Engn Mecan, Rua Dr Roberto Frias, P-4200465 Oporto, Portugal
[3] Inst Politecn Porto, ISEP, Dept Engn Mecan, Rua Dr Antonio Bernardino de Almeida 431, Oporto, Portugal
关键词
Cohesive zone model; ageing; durability; mechanical properties of adhesives; environment; STRUCTURAL ADHESIVE; FRACTURE-TOUGHNESS; BONDED JOINTS;
D O I
10.1177/1464420715610248
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Cohesive zone elements used in finite element analysis are a reliable way to design and predict the behaviour of the joint. The characterisation of the traction separation law used in these models is done using tensile and fracture tests, and the parameters of such laws depend on humidity and temperature. Water diffusion tests are therefore necessary, which are dependent on specimen geometry, meaning a bigger specimen takes longer to fully saturate. To solve this problem and increase the efficiency of the ageing process, smaller tensile bulk and double cantilever beam (DCB) specimens are necessary. Another advantage of smaller DCB specimens is that they can be tested in smaller high-temperature chambers, where normal DCB specimens do not fit. Smaller geometries of the bulk tensile and DCB tests are analysed, and a proposed geometry for each test is shown to produce very satisfactory results, validating the use of these specimens.
引用
收藏
页码:968 / 982
页数:15
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Adherend thickness effect on the tensile fracture toughness of a structural adhesive using an optical data acquisition method [J].
Campilho, R. D. S. G. ;
Moura, D. C. ;
Banea, M. D. ;
da Silva, L. F. M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2014, 53 :15-22
[2]   Modelling adhesive joints with cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive law shape of the adhesive layer [J].
Campilho, R. D. S. G. ;
Banea, M. D. ;
Neto, J. A. B. P. ;
da Silva, L. F. M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2013, 44 :48-56
[3]   Influence of Layer Thickness on Cohesive Properties of an Epoxy-Based AdhesiveAn Experimental Study [J].
Carlberger, Thomas ;
Stigh, Ulf .
JOURNAL OF ADHESION, 2010, 86 (08) :814-833
[4]   An inverse analysis of cohesive zone model parameter values for ductile crack growth simulations [J].
Chen, Xin ;
Deng, Xiaomin ;
Sutton, Michael A. ;
Zavattieri, Pablo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 79 :206-215
[5]  
Crocombe AD, 2013, DESIGN ADHESIVE JOIN, P147
[6]  
da Silva L.F., 2012, Testing Adhesive Joints: Best practices
[7]   Fracture toughness of a structural adhesive under mixed mode loadings [J].
da Silva, L. F. M. ;
Esteves, V. H. C. ;
Chaves, F. J. P. .
MATERIALWISSENSCHAFT UND WERKSTOFFTECHNIK, 2011, 42 (05) :460-470
[8]   Manufacture of adhesive joints and bulk specimens with high-temperature adhesives [J].
da Silva, LFM ;
Adams, RD ;
Gibbs, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2004, 24 (01) :69-83
[9]  
da Silva LFM, 2008, MODELING ADHESIVELY, px
[10]  
da Silva LFM, 2011, HANDBOOK OF ADHESION TECHNOLOGY, VOL 1 AND 2, P689, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-01169-6_27