Intellectual property rights, social values, and innovation: a cross-country simultaneous equations model

被引:4
作者
Francis, Deep Jyoti [1 ,2 ]
Bhaduri, Saradindu [1 ]
机构
[1] Jawaharlal Nehru Univ, Ctr Studies Sci Policy, Sch Social Sci, New Delhi, India
[2] Natl Inst Educ Planning & Adm, New Delhi, India
关键词
Intellectual property rights; social values; innovation; comparative institutional analysis; cross-country study; simultaneous equation model; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL CAPABILITIES; INSTITUTIONS; LAW; PROTECTION; ECONOMICS; PATENTS; FINANCE; POLICY; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1080/10438599.2019.1700607
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The WTO-led globalization is often believed to be the era of transfer and homogenization of the so-called 'Global Standard Institutions' (GSI). The institution of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) is a case in point, where various trade treaties have persuaded countries to homogenize the IPR laws, purportedly, to boost technological change and innovation. Such enthusiasm to homogenize the international policy space, however, is often at odds with the conjectures made by the scholars on institutions, who suggest that transfer of institutions across societies are burdened with problems of incompatibilities with other existing institutions, social values and historical, country-specific contingencies. Moreover, academic scholarship is divided on the relationship between IPR and innovations. This paper uses cross-country simultaneous equation estimations to analyze the two-way relationships between IPR, its underlying social values, historical-political contingencies, and innovation. Taking into consideration both technological and non-technological innovation, our results suggest that the impact of IPR on innovation dynamics of a country is neither one-way nor linear. Besides, various social values and historical contingencies seem to have a complex relationship with, and consequence on, the dynamics of innovation and IPR. The results suggest the need for interlinking development policies with the policies for innovations.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 316
页数:22
相关论文
共 122 条
[1]   The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation [J].
Acemoglu, D ;
Johnson, S ;
Robinson, JA .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (05) :1369-1401
[2]  
ACEMOGLU D, 2013, WHY NATIONS FAIL ORI, P70
[3]  
Alford W., 1995, STEAL BOOK IS ELEGAN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1989, STATE DEMOCRACY SEAR
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Introduction to Econometrics
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1993, 5 PROPOSITIONS I CHA
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Understanding institutional diversity
[8]  
Aoki M., 2007, Journal of Institutional Economics, V3, P1, DOI [10.1017/S1744137406000531, DOI 10.1017/S1744137406000531]
[9]  
Barton JH., 2002, Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy: Report of the Commission on Intellectual Property Rights
[10]  
Bessen J, 2008, PATENT FAILURE: HOW JUDGES, BUREAUCRATS, AND LAWYERS PUT INNOVATORS AT RISK, P1