The analysis of bridging constructs with hierarchical clustering methods: An application to identity

被引:15
作者
Farrelly, Colleen M. [1 ]
Schwartz, Seth J. [2 ]
Amodeo, Anna Lisa [3 ]
Feaster, Daniel J. [2 ]
Steinley, Douglas L. [4 ]
Meca, Alan [5 ]
Picariello, Simona [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] 3200 Port Royale Dr North, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33308 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, 1120 NW 14th St, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[3] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Humanist Studies, Via Porta Massa 1, I-80138 Naples, Italy
[4] Univ Missouri Columbia, Dept Psychol Sci, 210 McAlester Hall, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[5] Old Dominion Univ, Dept Psychol, 250 Mills Godwin Life Sci Bldg 134A, Norfolk, VA 23529 USA
[6] Univ Naples Federico II, Ctr Atheneum SInAPSi, Via Giulio Cesare Cortese, I-80138 Naples, Italy
关键词
Cluster analysis; Bridging constructs; Identity; Measurement; EXPLORATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; PARALLEL ANALYSIS; SAMPLE-SIZE; NUMBER; COMPONENTS; MULTIVARIATE; VARIABLES; HOMOLOGY; GENOME; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrp.2017.06.005
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
When analyzing psychometric surveys, some design and sample size limitations challenge existing approaches. Hierarchical clustering, with its graphics (heat maps, dendrograms, means plots), provides a nonparametric method for analyzing factorially-designed survey data, and small samples data. In the present study, we demonstrated the advantages of using hierarchical clustering (MC) for the analysis of non-higher-order measures, comparing the results of HC against those of exploratory factor analysis. As a factorially-designed survey, we used the Identity Labels and Life Contexts Questionnaire (ILLCQ), a novel measure to assess identity as a bridging construct for the intersection of identity domains and life contexts. Results suggest that, when used to validate factorially-designed measures, HC and its graphics are more stable and consistent compared to EFA. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 106
页数:14
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Aggarwal CC, 2014, CH CRC DATA MIN KNOW, P1
[2]  
[Anonymous], SOCIAL CONTEXTS UNDE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, CONFIRMATORY FACTOR
[4]   Random Projections of Smooth Manifolds [J].
Baraniuk, Richard G. ;
Wakin, Michael B. .
FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTATIONAL MATHEMATICS, 2009, 9 (01) :51-77
[5]   Identity-in-context is not yet identity development-in-context [J].
Bosma, Harke A. ;
Kunnen, E. Saskia .
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENCE, 2008, 31 (02) :281-289
[6]   Exploring the new world of the genome with DNA microarrays [J].
Brown, PO ;
Botstein, D .
NATURE GENETICS, 1999, 21 (Suppl 1) :33-37
[7]  
Burago D., 2001, A Course in Metric Geometry, DOI [10.1090/gsm/033, DOI 10.1090/GSM/033]
[8]   Modeling General and Specific Variance in Multifaceted Constructs: A Comparison of the Bifactor Model to Other Approaches [J].
Chen, Fang Fang ;
Hayes, Adele ;
Carver, Charles S. ;
Laurenceau, Jean-Philippe ;
Zhang, Zugui .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2012, 80 (01) :219-251
[9]   REVIEW OF CLASSIFICATION [J].
CORMACK, RM .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-GENERAL, 1971, 134 :321-+
[10]   Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration [J].
Diamantopoulos, Adamantios ;
Siguaw, Judy A. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2006, 17 (04) :263-282