Proximal femoral nail for the treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures compared with gamma nail

被引:65
|
作者
Min, Woo-Kie
Kim, Shin-Yoon
Kim, Tae-Kong
Lee, Kyu-Bong
Cho, Myung-Rae
Ha, Yong-Chan
Koo, Kyung-Hoi
机构
[1] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Taejon 700721, South Korea
[2] Daegu Catholic Univ, Coll Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Taejon, South Korea
[3] Kyungsang Natl Univ, Coll Med, Jinju, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
reverse obliquity; intertrochanteric; PFN; GN;
D O I
10.1097/01.ta.0000240455.06842.a0
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: The reverse obliquity fracture of the proximal femur (AO/OTA 31-A3) is mechanically different from most intertrochanteric fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of proximal femoral nail (PFN) fixation with those of gamma nail (GN) fixation for these fractures. Methods: Between 1993 and 2003, 635 of the fractures were classified as intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric. Clinical and radiographic records were retrospectively reviewed, and 22 fractures with reverse obliquity pattern were identified. The patients were divided into two treatment groups and were followed up for a minimum of 1 year (range, 12-67 months). Eleven patients in group I were treated with the PFN, and 11 patients in group 11 were treated with the GN. The two groups were comparable with regard to demographic and injury variables. The duration of follow-up averaged 18 months (range, 12-67 months). Radiographic changes during the follow-up, clinical outcome, and complications of the PFN group were compared with those of the GN group. Results: Reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures accounted for 4.3% of intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. Bone union time averaged 16.5 weeks in the PFN group and 17.9 weeks in the GN group. Average sliding of lag screw was 2.5 mm in the PFN group and 3.1 mm in the GN group (p = 0.046). Change of the neck-shaft angle was 2.45 degrees in the PFN group and 3.75 degrees in the GN group (p = 0.032). A satisfactory functional outcome was found in eight patients in the PFN group and also in eight patients in the GN group. There was one osteonecrosis of femoral head in the PFN group. There was one cutting out of lag screw, one nonunion, and one varus deformity in the GN group. Conclusion: There was no difference in clinical outcome between the PFN and GN groups. However, the PFN demonstrated better results biomechanically than the GN did in terms of less sliding of lag screw, less change of neckshaft angle, and less complications for the treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures.
引用
收藏
页码:1054 / 1060
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Treatment of reverse oblique trochanteric femoral fractures with proximal femoral nail
    Korhan Ozkan
    Engin Eceviz
    Koray Unay
    Levent Tasyikan
    Budak Akman
    Abdullah Eren
    International Orthopaedics, 2011, 35 : 595 - 598
  • [22] Treatment of reverse oblique trochanteric femoral fractures with proximal femoral nail
    Ozkan, Korhan
    Eceviz, Engin
    Unay, Koray
    Tasyikan, Levent
    Akman, Budak
    Eren, Abdullah
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2011, 35 (04) : 595 - 598
  • [23] Proximal Femoral Nail versus Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation: Functional and Radiological Outcome in Intertrochanteric Fractures of Femur
    Singh, Siddhartha
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (10)
  • [24] Treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures - Randomised comparison of the gamma nail and the proximal femoral nail
    Schipper, IB
    Steyerberg, EW
    Castelein, RM
    van der Heijden, FHWM
    den Hoed, PT
    Kerver, AJH
    van Vugt, AB
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2004, 86B (01): : 86 - 94
  • [25] Employing a modified gamma nail for the treatment of proximal femoral fractures
    Gahr, RH
    Pawelka, A
    UNFALLCHIRURG, 2003, 106 (07): : 550 - 555
  • [26] TREATMENT OF INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES IN AMBULATORY ELDERLY; BIPOLAR HEMIARTHROPLASTY OR PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL ?
    Aydin, Erbil
    Kurtulus, Burhan
    Celik, Bulent
    Okan, Mehmet
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF GERIATRICS-TURK GERIATRI DERGISI, 2016, 19 (01): : 42 - 49
  • [27] Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus hemiarthroplasty: A study for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures
    Tang, Peifu
    Hu, Fangke
    Shen, Jing
    Zhang, Licheng
    Zhang, Lihai
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2012, 43 (06): : 876 - 881
  • [28] Intramedullary Fixation of Intertrochanteric Fractures with the Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN)
    Akhil P. Verheyden
    Christoph Josten
    European Journal of Trauma, 2004, 30 (3): : 197 - 206
  • [29] Finite element analysis of two cephalomedullary nails in treatment of elderly reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures: zimmer natural nail and proximal femoral nail antirotation-ΙΙ (vol 14, 422, 2019)
    Chen, Jian
    Ma, Jian-xiong
    Wang, Ying
    Bai, Hao-hao
    Sun, Lei
    Wang, Yan
    Lu, Bin
    Dong, Ben-chao
    Tian, Ai-xian
    Ma, Xin-long
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [30] Biomechanical outcome of proximal femoral nail antirotation is superior to proximal femoral locking compression plate for reverse oblique intertrochanteric fractures: a biomechanical study of intertrochanteric fractures
    Ma, Jian-Xiong
    Wang, Jie
    Xu, Wei-Guo
    Yu, Jing-Tao
    Yang, Yang
    Ma, Xin-Long
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2015, 49 (04) : 426 - 432