Effectiveness assessment of Cyber-Physical Systems

被引:4
|
作者
Rocher, Gerald [1 ,2 ]
Tigli, Jean-Yves [2 ,3 ]
Lavirotte, Stephane [2 ,3 ]
Nhan Le Thanh [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] GFI Informat, St Ouen, France
[2] UCA, Sophia Antipolis, France
[3] CNRS, Lab I3S, Sophia Antipolis, France
关键词
Cyber Physical Systems; Degree of effectiveness; Transferable Belief Model; Input/Output Hidden Markov Model; Zone of viability; TRANSFERABLE BELIEF MODEL; HIDDEN MARKOV-MODELS; COMBINATION; TAXONOMY; HMMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijar.2019.12.002
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
By achieving their purposes through interactions with the physical world, Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) pose new challenges in terms of dependability. Indeed, the evolution of the physical systems they control with transducers can be affected by surrounding physical processes over which they have no control and which may potentially hamper the achievement of their purposes. While it is illusory to hope for a comprehensive model of the physical environment at design time to anticipate and remove faults that may occur once these systems are deployed, it becomes necessary to evaluate their degree of effectiveness in vivo. In this paper, the degree of effectiveness is formally defined and generalized in the context of the measure theory. The measure is developed in the context of the Transferable Belief Model (TBM), an elaboration on the Dempster-Shafer Theory (DST) of evidence so as to handle epistemic and aleatory uncertainties respectively pertaining the users' expectations and the natural variability of the physical environment. The TBM is used in conjunction with the Input/Output Hidden Markov Modeling framework we denote by Ev-IOHMM to specify the expected evolution of the physical system controlled by the CPS and the tolerances towards uncertainties. The measure of effectiveness is then obtained from the forward algorithm, leveraging the conflict entailed by the successive combinations of the beliefs obtained from observations of the physical system and the beliefs corresponding to its expected evolution. The proposed approach is applied to autonomous vehicles and shows how the degree of effectiveness can be used for bench-marking their controller relative to the highway code speed limitations and passengers' well-being constraints, both modeled through an Ev-IOHMM. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 132
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Process execution in Cyber-Physical Systems using cloud and Cyber-Physical Internet services
    Borja Bordel
    Ramón Alcarria
    Diego Sánchez de Rivera
    Tomás Robles
    The Journal of Supercomputing, 2018, 74 : 4127 - 4169
  • [22] Threat modeling in cyber-physical systems
    Fernandez, Eduardo B.
    2016 IEEE 14TH INTL CONF ON DEPENDABLE, AUTONOMIC AND SECURE COMPUTING, 14TH INTL CONF ON PERVASIVE INTELLIGENCE AND COMPUTING, 2ND INTL CONF ON BIG DATA INTELLIGENCE AND COMPUTING AND CYBER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CONGRESS (DASC/PICOM/DATACOM/CYBERSC, 2016, : 448 - 453
  • [23] Programming Cyber-Physical Systems with MacroLab
    Sookoor, Tamim I.
    Hnat, Timothy W.
    Whitehouse, Kamin
    SENSYS'08: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH ACM CONFERENCE ON EMBEDDED NETWORKED SENSOR SYSTEMS, 2008, : 363 - 364
  • [24] Cyber-Physical Systems in Smart Transportation
    Moeller, Dietmar P. F.
    Vakilzadian, Hamid
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (EIT), 2016, : 776 - 781
  • [25] Doping Tests for Cyber-physical Systems
    Biewer, Sebastian
    D'Argenio, Pedro
    Hermanns, Holger
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON MODELING AND COMPUTER SIMULATION, 2021, 31 (03):
  • [26] Characterization of Cyber-Physical Sensor Systems
    Berger, Christoph
    Hees, Andreas
    Braunreuther, Stefan
    Reinhart, Gunther
    RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN MANUFACTURING: KEY ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE FACTORIES OF THE FUTURE - PROCEEDINGS OF THE 48TH CIRP CONFERENCE ON MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2016, 41 : 638 - 643
  • [27] Task Scheduling in Cyber-Physical Systems
    Liu, Chunyao
    Zhang, Lichen
    Zhang, Daqiang
    2014 IEEE 11TH INTL CONF ON UBIQUITOUS INTELLIGENCE AND COMPUTING AND 2014 IEEE 11TH INTL CONF ON AUTONOMIC AND TRUSTED COMPUTING AND 2014 IEEE 14TH INTL CONF ON SCALABLE COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS AND ITS ASSOCIATED WORKSHOPS, 2014, : 319 - 324
  • [28] Rethinking the Honeypot for Cyber-Physical Systems
    Litchfield, Samuel
    Formby, David
    Rogers, Jonathan
    Meliopoulos, Sakis
    Beyah, Raheem
    IEEE INTERNET COMPUTING, 2016, 20 (05) : 9 - 17
  • [29] Middleware to Support Cyber-Physical Systems
    Mohamed, Nader
    Al-Jaroodi, Jameela
    Lazarova-Molnar, Sanja
    Jawhar, Imad
    2016 IEEE 35TH INTERNATIONAL PERFORMANCE COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE (IPCCC), 2016,
  • [30] Semantic Cyber-physical Cloud Systems
    Beres, Adela
    2017 5TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON DIGITAL FORENSIC AND SECURITY (ISDFS), 2017,