Distributed Dynamic State Estimation and LQG Control in Resource-Constrained Networks

被引:8
作者
Yilmaz, Yasin [1 ]
Kurt, Mehmet Necip [2 ]
Wang, Xiaodong [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Dept Elect Engn, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Elect Engn, New York, NY 10027 USA
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL AND INFORMATION PROCESSING OVER NETWORKS | 2018年 / 4卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Networked control systems; level-crossing sampling; distributed Kalman filter; LQG control; asymptotic optimality; unreliable communications; EVENT-TRIGGERED CONTROL; SYSTEMS; COMMUNICATION; COST;
D O I
10.1109/TSIPN.2018.2801460
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
In this paper, the discrete-time distributed dynamic state estimation and linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) control problems are analyzed for resource-constrained networked systems. Following a holistic approach, we provide a complete system design for the signal processing, communication, and control tasks involved in the problems; and evaluate their performance. In the presence of a controller node and a number of sensor nodes, the sensor nodes, in a resource-efficient way, report their information entities to the controller node using an event-triggered sampling technique called level-crossing sampling. We demonstrate the performance gains due to level-crossing sampling over conventional time-triggered uniform sampling, as well as the advantages of processing data locally before transmitting to the controller. In particular, it is shown that the proposed decentralized schemes with local processing and level-crossing sampling ensure a very close approximation, with a bounded error, to the optimum (centralized) estimation and control schemes, and as a result yield order-2 asymptotic optimality. Moreover, nonideal communication between sensors and the controller is considered, and optimal modulation techniques are provided for different channel models. Simulation results are provided to support the presented discussions.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 612
页数:14
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MATH PROBL ENG
[2]  
[Anonymous], EVENT BASED CONTROL
[3]  
Cetinkaya A, 2015, IEEE DECIS CONTR P, P4818, DOI 10.1109/CDC.2015.7402971
[4]   On the Trade-Off Between Communication and Control Cost in Event-Triggered Dead-Beat Control [J].
Demirel, Burak ;
Gupta, Vijay ;
Quevedo, Daniel E. ;
Johansson, Mikael .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2017, 62 (06) :2973-2980
[5]  
Fairman Frederick Walker, 1998, Linear Control Theory: State Space Approach
[6]   Decentralized Sequential Hypothesis Testing Using Asynchronous Communication [J].
Fellouris, Georgios ;
Moustakides, George V. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 2011, 57 (01) :534-548
[7]   Model-Based Event-Triggered Control for Systems With Quantization and Time-Varying Network Delays [J].
Garcia, Eloy ;
Antsaklis, Panos J. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2013, 58 (02) :422-434
[8]   A survey of recent results in networked control systems [J].
Hespanha, Joao P. ;
Naghshtabrizi, Payam ;
Xu, Yonggang .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2007, 95 (01) :138-162
[9]   LQG control of networked control systems with access constraints and delays [J].
Hristu-Varsakelis, D. ;
Zhang, Lei .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 2008, 81 (08) :1266-1280
[10]  
Kalman R., 1960, Journal of Basic Engineering, V82, P35, DOI [DOI 10.1115/1.3662552, 10.1115/1.3662552]