Small and beautiful? The Programme of Activities and the least developed countries

被引:1
作者
Bayer, Patrick [1 ]
Pinkerton, Valerie M. [2 ]
Urpelainen, Johannes [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mannheim, Dept Polit Sci, D-68131 Mannheim, Germany
[2] Environm Law Inst, Washington, DC USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Dept Polit Sci, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
Kyoto Protocol; climate policy; governance; Programme of Activities; flexibility mechanisms; Clean Development Mechanism; CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM; CDM; PROJECTS; DEMOCRACY; POLICIES;
D O I
10.1080/17565529.2014.900471
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Most carbon abatement projects under the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) have been implemented in rapidly industrializing countries, notably China and India. To support small carbon abatement projects and to promote decarbonization in the least developed countries, the Programme of Activities (PoA) modality was introduced. Are the determinants of project implementation different under the PoA from those of conventional CDM projects? To answer this question, we conduct a statistical analysis of the global distribution of CDM projects and PoAs during the years 2007-2012. In regard to country size, large countries clearly dominate both the CDM and PoA, suggesting that the PoA may do only little to facilitate project implementation in small countries. However, the number of PoAs has a strong negative association with a country's corruption level, while the importance of corruption for the CDM is much smaller. Moreover, per capita income has no effect on PoA implementation, while high wealth levels have a weak positive effect on CDM projects. Thus, the PoA modality seems to promote sustainable development in poor countries that have exceeded a certain threshold of good governance. In this regard, PoAs are directing carbon credits to new areas, as many had initially hoped.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 164
页数:12
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Power for Development: A Review of Distributed Generation Projects in the Developing World [J].
Brass, Jennifer N. ;
Carley, Sanya ;
MacLean, Lauren M. ;
Baldwin, Elizabeth .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, VOL 37, 2012, 37 :107-136
[2]   Productive uses of energy for rural development [J].
Cabraal, RA ;
Barnes, DF ;
Agarwal, SG .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2005, 30 :117-144
[4]   Would preferential access measures be sufficient to overcome current barriers to CDM projects in least developed countries? [J].
Castro, Paula ;
Michaelowa, Axel .
CLIMATE AND DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 3 (02) :123-142
[5]   Democracy and dictatorship revisited [J].
Cheibub, Jose Antonio ;
Gandhi, Jennifer ;
Vreeland, James Raymond .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 2010, 143 (1-2) :67-101
[6]   The potential of the CDM to deliver pro-poor benefits [J].
Crowe, Tracey L. .
CLIMATE POLICY, 2013, 13 (01) :58-79
[7]   Local Actions, Global Impacts: International Cooperation and the CDM [J].
Dinar, Ariel ;
Rahman, Shaikh Mahfuzur ;
Larson, Donald F. ;
Ambrosi, Philippe .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2011, 11 (04) :108-+
[8]   Sustainable development in the Clean Development Mechanism: the role of Designated National Authority in China and India [J].
Ganapati, Sukumar ;
Liu, Liguang .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 52 (01) :43-60
[9]  
Greene W., 2005, FINANCE CLIMATE CHAN, P353
[10]   Host country attractiveness for CDM non-sink projects [J].
Jung, Martina .
ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (15) :2173-2184