A multi-service approach for planning the optimal mix of energy storage technologies in a fully-renewable power supply

被引:66
|
作者
Haas, J. [1 ,3 ]
Cebulla, F. [2 ]
Nowak, W. [1 ]
Rahmann, C. [3 ]
Palma-Behnke, R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stuttgart, Dept Stochast Simulat & Safety Res Hydrosyst IWS, Stuttgart, Germany
[2] Univ Stuttgart, Dept Syst Anal & Technol Assessment, DLR, Inst Engn Thermodynam, Stuttgart, Germany
[3] Univ Chile, Dept Elect Engn, Energy Ctr, Santiago, Chile
关键词
Generation expansion planning; Flexibility; Integration of renewable technologies; Low-carbon systems; Electrical energy storage; Paris Agreement; SYSTEM; GENERATION; DEMAND; WIND; REQUIREMENTS; DESALINATION; ELECTRICITY; TRANSITION; CHILE; NEED;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2018.09.087
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Energy storage systems (ESS) are a structural solution for the integration of renewable energy systems. To plan the optimal combination of ESS, storage expansion planning approaches are commonly used. They tend to focus on balancing the energy fluctuations from renewable technologies but are usually blind to the need for specific additional services required for dealing with forecast errors. Hence, they underestimate the real operating costs of the future power system and lead to suboptimal investment recommendations. In response, we propose a multi-service storage expansion approach. A linear programming optimization is developed, LEELO, to find the optimal investments in a 100% renewable system (based on solar photovoltaic and wind power) deciding on renewable generators and storage systems. In our formulation, we explicitly model the provisioning of power reserves and energy autonomy as additional services. A case study applies our model to Chile considering four regions and the (existing) hydro-power park, for a complete year with an hourly resolution. We systematically assess how our novel multi-service planning differs from conventional energy-based planning in terms of total costs, operation, and investment decisions (with a focus on ESS). Considering power reserves and energy autonomy reveals on average 20% higher costs that otherwise would not be captured in the expansion planning process. Regarding operation, ESS show only slight differences in the two planning models. All ESS participate in the provision of energy. As might be expected, batteries are the main provider of (short-term) power reserves, assisted by pumped-hydro, whereas hydrogen storage is responsible for providing (long-term) energy autonomy. However, the storage investment decisions differ significantly between both models. In our multi-service model, the attained power capacities and energy capacities are up to 1.6 and 3.2 times larger, respectively than in conventional planning. The resulting storage mix changes even more strongly: a general shift towards hydrogen systems is observed. Mainly batteries are substituted, while pumped hydro capacities stay relatively constant. The trend of the above results is consistent for various scenarios of wind and photovoltaic generation and for sensitivities of service parameters. Our findings underline the importance of modeling multi-services in the planning of renewable-based power systems.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 368
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multi-objective capacity optimization of renewable energy power system considering techno-economic comparisons of various energy storage technologies
    Guo S.
    He Y.
    Aynur K.
    Song G.
    Wang H.
    Pei H.
    Taiyangneng Xuebao/Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2022, 43 (10): : 424 - 431
  • [32] Optimal planning of energy storage system for hybrid power system considering multi correlated input stochastic variables
    Alahmad, Ahmad K.
    Verayiah, Renuga
    Ramasamy, Agileswari
    Marsadek, Marayati
    Shareef, Hussain
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2024, 82
  • [33] Optimal planning of energy storage system for hybrid power system considering multi correlated input stochastic variables
    ALAhmad, Ahmad K.
    Verayiah, Renuga
    Ramasamy, Agileswari
    Marsadek, Marayati
    Shareef, Hussain
    Journal of Energy Storage, 2024, 82
  • [34] Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Approach for Optimal Power Flow of Distribution Networks Embedded with Renewable Energy and Storage Devices
    Di Cao
    Weihao Hu
    Xiao Xu
    Qiuwei Wu
    Qi Huang
    Zhe Chen
    Frede Blaabjerg
    JournalofModernPowerSystemsandCleanEnergy, 2021, 9 (05) : 1101 - 1110
  • [35] Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Approach for Optimal Power Flow of Distribution Networks Embedded with Renewable Energy and Storage Devices
    Cao, Di
    Hu, Weihao
    Xu, Xiao
    Wu, Qiuwei
    Huang, Qi
    Chen, Zhe
    Blaabjerg, Frede
    JOURNAL OF MODERN POWER SYSTEMS AND CLEAN ENERGY, 2021, 9 (05) : 1101 - 1110
  • [36] Optimal operation of multi-carrier energy networks with gas, power, heating, and water energy sources considering different energy storage technologies
    Nazari-Heris, Morteza
    Mohammadi-Ivatloo, Behnam
    Asadi, Somayeh
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2020, 31
  • [37] Multi-objective Optimal Dispatch Model and Its Algorithm in Isolated Microgrid With Renewable Energy Generation as Main Power Supply
    Chen H.
    Guan L.
    Lu C.
    Li Z.
    Zhuo Y.
    Dianwang Jishu/Power System Technology, 2020, 44 (02): : 664 - 672
  • [38] A probabilistic electric power distribution automation operational planning approach considering energy storage incorporation in service restoration
    Khatib-Tohidkhaneh, Farzan
    Mohammadi-Hosseininejad, Seyed Mohsen
    Saberi, Hossein
    INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRICAL ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2020, 30 (05):
  • [39] Green hydrogen-based energy storage service via power-to-gas technologies integrated with multi-energy microgrid
    Qiu, Rui
    Zhang, Haoran
    Wang, Guotao
    Liang, Yongtu
    Yan, Jinyue
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2023, 350
  • [40] Planning shared energy storage systems for the spatio-temporal coordination of multi-site renewable energy sources on the power generation side
    Song, Xiaoling
    Zhang, Huqing
    Fan, Lurong
    Zhang, Zhe
    Pena-Mora, Feniosky
    ENERGY, 2023, 282