Annealing of Monel 400 Alloy Using Principal Component Analysis, Hyper-parameter Optimization, Machine Learning Techniques, and Multi-objective Particle Swarm Optimization

被引:21
作者
Chintakindi, Sanjay [1 ]
Alsamhan, Ali [1 ]
Abidi, Mustufa Haider [2 ]
Kumar, Maduri Praveen [3 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Coll Engn, Ind Engn Dept, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Saud Univ, Adv Mfg Inst, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
[3] Univ Leicester, Leicester, Leics, England
关键词
Monel-400; Annealing; Principal component analysis; Optuna; Machine learning; Multi-objective particle swarm optimization; SURFACE-ROUGHNESS PREDICTION; HYPERPARAMETER OPTIMIZATION; MACHINABILITY; TOOL;
D O I
10.1007/s44196-022-00070-z
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of the annealing process at 1000 degrees C on machining parameters using contemporary techniques such as principal component analysis (PCA), hyper-parameter optimization by Optuna, multi-objective particle swarm optimization, and theoretical validation using the machine learning method. Results after annealing show that there will be a reduction in surface roughness values by 19.61%, tool wear by 6.3%, and an increase in the metal removal rate by 14.98%. The PCA results show that the feed is more significant than the depth of cut and speed. The higher value of the composite primary component will represent optimal factors such as speed of 80, feed of 0.2 and depth of cut of 0.3, and values of principal components like surface roughness (psi(1) = 64.5), tool wear (psi(2) = 22.3) and metal removal rate (psi(3) = 13.2). Hyper-parameter optimization represents speed is directly proportional to roughness, tool wear, and metal removal rate, while feed and depth of cut are inversely proportional. The optimization history plot will be steady, and the prediction accuracy will be 96.96%. Machine learning techniques are employed through the Python language using Google Colab. The estimated values from the decision tree method for surface roughness and tool wear predictions using the AdaBoost algorithm match well with actual values. As per MOPSO (multi-objective particle swarm optimization), the predicted responses are as follows; surface roughness (2.5 mu m, 100, 02, 0.45), tool wear (0.31 mm, 40, 0.40, 0.60), and MRR (material removal rate) (5145 mm(3)/min, 100, 0.4, 0.15). As validated by experimentation, there are small variations as the surface roughness varied by 1.56%, tool wear by 6.8%, and MRR by 2.57%.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Fuzzy harmony search based optimal control strategy for wireless cyber physical system with industry 4.0 [J].
Abidi, Mustufa Haider ;
Alkhalefah, Hisham ;
Umer, Usama .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2022, 33 (06) :1795-1812
[2]   Optimal 5G network slicing using machine learning and deep learning concepts [J].
Abidi, Mustufa Haider ;
Alkhalefah, Hisham ;
Moiduddin, Khaja ;
Alazab, Mamoun ;
Mohammed, Muneer Khan ;
Ameen, Wadea ;
Gadekallu, Thippa Reddy .
COMPUTER STANDARDS & INTERFACES, 2021, 76
[3]   Automated Maintenance Data Classification Using Recurrent Neural Network: Enhancement by Spotted Hyena-Based Whale Optimization [J].
Abidi, Mustufa Haider ;
Umer, Usama ;
Mohammed, Muneer Khan ;
Aboudaif, Mohamed K. ;
Alkhalefah, Hisham .
MATHEMATICS, 2020, 8 (11) :1-33
[4]   Surface roughness prediction as a classification problem using support vector machine [J].
Abu-Mahfouz, Issam ;
El Ariss, Omar ;
Rahman, A. H. M. Esfakur ;
Banerjee, Amit .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 92 (1-4) :803-815
[5]  
Ahmed M., 2018, INT J ADV MANUF TECH, DOI [10.1007/s00170-018-2087-6, DOI 10.1007/S00170-018-2087-6]
[6]  
Akiba Takuya, 2019, OPTUNA NEXT GENERATI
[7]   Prediction and Optimization of Surface Roughness in a Turning Process Using the ANFIS-QPSO Method [J].
Alajmi, Mahdi S. ;
Almeshal, Abdullah M. .
MATERIALS, 2020, 13 (13) :1-23
[8]  
Arunkumar NE, 2020, MATER TODAY-PROC, V22, P2199
[9]   Surface roughness prediction model using adaptive particle swarm optimization (APSO) algorithm [J].
Babu, S. Senthil ;
Vinayagam, B. K. .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2015, 28 (01) :345-360
[10]  
Baili M, 2011, APPL MECH MATER, V62, P67, DOI 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.62.67