The Otology Questionnaire Amsterdam: A generic patient-reported outcome measure about the severity and impact of ear complaints. Validation, reliability and responsiveness

被引:5
作者
Kraak, Jeroen T. [1 ,2 ]
van Dam, Tom F. [1 ,2 ]
van Leeuwen, Lisette M. [1 ,2 ]
Kramer, Sophia E. [1 ,2 ]
Merkus, Paul [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Ear & Hearing, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
audiology; chronic otitis media; mouth; otology; sensorineural hearing loss; taste; tinnitus; vertigo; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1111/coa.13545
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective To examine the construct validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Otology Questionnaire Amsterdam (OQUA). Design Multicentre, longitudinal study in 2 separate cohorts of patients visiting an ENT surgeon via an online survey programme. Setting Tertiary ENT clinics. Participants Cohort 1 consisted of patients at their first visit at an ENT outpatient clinic with an ear complaint. Cohort 2 consisted of patients who underwent surgery, with a 3-month follow-up post-surgery. Main outcome measures Construct validity: Hypothesis testing, internal consistency and inter-item correlation. Reliability: Test-retest reliability. The construct approach was used for assessing responsiveness. Hypotheses were formulated based on the association between the OQUA and Glasgow Health Status Inventory (GHSI) or Global Rating Scale (GRS). Results Construct validity: The correlation between the individual items in the impact domain ranged from 0.424 to 0.737. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a good fit. As expected, the OQUA impact showed strong relationships with GHSI total and general scale. Reliability: The test-retest reliability coefficient ranged from 0.541 to 0.838. Responsiveness: All hypotheses were conformed. As expected, the change score of the OQUA showed good correlation between OQUA impact and GHSI and moderate correlation between the GRS and OQUA complaints. Conclusion The OQUA has 8 complaint domains (earache, pressure sensation, itching, tinnitus, hearing loss, ear discharge, loss of taste and dizziness) and 1 impact domain. Each domain results in one score of 0-100. The OQUA shows good results for construct validity, (test-retest) reliability and responsiveness, supporting the potential benefit for the patient with an ear complaint visiting the ENT surgeon. The extensive validation furthermore confirms a certified generic otology PROM with an impact and a complaints' part, to be used in different types of otologic interventions and patient groups.
引用
收藏
页码:506 / 516
页数:11
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   The Otology Questionnaire Amsterdam: a generic patient reported outcome measure about the severity and impact of ear complaints. A cross-sectional study on the development of this questionnaire [J].
Bruinewoud, E. M. ;
Kraak, J. T. ;
van Leeuwen, L. M. ;
Kramer, S. E. ;
Merkus, P. .
CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 43 (01) :240-248
[2]  
Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA, V2, DOI [10.4324/9780203771587, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587-1]
[3]  
de Vet H.C.W, 2011, MEASUREMENT MED PRAC, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511996214
[4]   Providing an extended use of an otological-specific outcome instrument to derive cost-effectiveness estimates of treatment [J].
Frew, E. J. ;
Harrison, M. ;
Roig, Rossello M. ;
Martin, T. P. C. .
CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2015, 40 (06) :593-599
[5]   Validation of the Meniere's disease patient-oriented symptom-severity index [J].
Gates, GA ;
Verrall, AM .
ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2005, 131 (10) :863-867
[6]   Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives [J].
Hu, Li-tze ;
Bentler, Peter M. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 1999, 6 (01) :1-55
[7]  
JACOBSON GP, 1990, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V116, P424
[8]   MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA [J].
LANDIS, JR ;
KOCH, GG .
BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) :159-174
[9]   The Cambridge Otology Quality of Life Questionnaire: an otology-specific patient-recorded outcome measure. A paper describing the instrument design and a report of preliminary reliability and validity [J].
Martin, T. P. C. ;
Moualed, D. ;
Paul, A. ;
Ronan, N. ;
Tysome, J. R. ;
Donnelly, N. P. ;
Cook, R. ;
Axon, P. R. .
CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2015, 40 (02) :130-139
[10]  
Mokkink L., Cosmin checklist manual. Vol