Nerve-sparing robotic prostatectomy in preoperatively high-risk patients is safe and efficacious

被引:44
作者
Lavery, Hugh J. [1 ]
Nabizada-Pace, Fatima [1 ]
Carlucci, John R. [1 ]
Brajtbord, Jonathan S. [1 ]
Samadi, David B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Div Robot & Minimally Invas Surg, New York, NY 10022 USA
关键词
Neoplasm; Prostate; Robotics; Prostatectomy; LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS; EXTRACAPSULAR EXTENSION; NEUROVASCULAR BUNDLE; SEXUAL FUNCTION; CANCER; ANTIGEN; SIDE; PREDICTION; NOMOGRAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.11.023
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: Given the higher likelihood of extraprostatic extension in high-risk patients, many urologists will sacrifice the neurovascular bundles in such patients in an attempt to decrease the risk of positive surgical margins. In contrast, we frequently perform nerve-sparing in high-risk patients. We analyzed our outcomes in patients with preoperatively high-risk prostate cancer according to the D'Amico risk group classification, and stratified by nerve-sparing status. Materials and methods: An institutional database of 1,503 robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomies (RALP) was queried for patients presenting with PSA > 20 ng/ml, Gleason 8 or higher on biopsy, or clinical stage T2c or higher. Interfascial nerve-sparing was performed whenever oncologically feasible. Validated questionnaires were used to assess baseline and postoperative functional outcomes. Results: Adequate follow-up was available in 123 high-risk patients. Mean serum PSA was 10.8. Bilateral, unilateral, and non-nervesparing was performed on 58%, 15%, and 27%, respectively. On final histopathology, 42% were organ confined; 55 patients had extraprostatic extension, and 35 had seminal vesicle invasion. Positive surgical margins occurred in 31%; 15% focal and 16% extensive. Favorable pathologic outcomes (organ-confined and negative surgical margins) were observed in 40%. Biochemical recurrence occurred in 20%. Nerve-sparing was associated with more favorable pathologic features, possibly due to selection bias. When controlling for adverse pathologic features, nerve-sparing was not associated with higher rates of positive surgical margins or biochemical recurrence. At a median follow-up of 13 months, 78% were continent and 56% were potent. The "trifecta" of continence, potency, and freedom from recurrence was achieved in 28 patients (23%). Conclusions: Nerve-sparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy can be safely performed in patients with preoperatively high risk prostate cancer. Histopathologic and short-term oncologic outcomes at 13-month median follow-up are comparable to those in open surgical series from similar cohorts. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 32
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Clinical and pathologic outcome after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer patients with a preoperative Gleason sum of 8 to 10 [J].
Bastian, Patrick J. ;
Gonzalgo, Mark L. ;
Aronson, William J. ;
Terris, Martha K. ;
Kane, Christopher J. ;
Amling, Christopher L. ;
Presti, Joseph C., Jr. ;
Mangold, Leslie A. ;
Humphreys, Elizabeth ;
Epstein, Jonathan I. ;
Partin, Alan W. ;
Freedland, Stephen J. .
CANCER, 2006, 107 (06) :1265-1272
[2]   Biochemical disease-free survival in patients with a high prostate-specific antigen level (20-100 ng/mL) and clinically localized prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy [J].
Brandli, DW ;
Koch, MO ;
Foster, RS ;
Bihrle, R ;
Gardner, TA .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 92 (01) :19-22
[3]   Androgen suppression and radiation vs radiation alone for prostate cancer - A randomized trial [J].
D'Amico, Anthony V. ;
Chen, Ming-Hui ;
Renshaw, Andrew A. ;
Loffredo, Marian ;
Kantoff, Philip W. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 299 (03) :289-295
[4]   Pretreatment nomogram for prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Whittington, R ;
Malkowicz, SB ;
Fondurulia, J ;
Chen, MH ;
Kaplan, I ;
Beard, CJ ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Renshaw, AA ;
Wein, A ;
Coleman, CN .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (01) :168-172
[5]   Poorly differentiated prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy: Long-term outcome and incidence of pathological downgrading [J].
Donohue, John F. ;
Bianco, Fernando J., Jr. ;
Kuroiwa, Kentaro ;
Vickers, Andrew J. ;
Wheeler, Thomas M. ;
Scardino, Peter T. ;
Reuter, Victor A. ;
Eastham, James A. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (03) :991-995
[6]   Risk factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy [J].
Eastham, JA ;
Kattan, MW ;
Rogers, E ;
Goad, JR ;
Ohori, M ;
Boone, TB ;
Scardino, PT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 156 (05) :1707-1713
[7]   Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Cumulative Analysis of Comparative Studies [J].
Ficarra, Vincenzo ;
Novara, Giacomo ;
Artibani, Walter ;
Cestari, Andrea ;
Galfano, Antonio ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Guazzoni, Giorgio ;
Guillonneau, Bertrand ;
Menon, Mani ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Patel, Vipul ;
Rassweiler, Jens ;
Van Poppel, Hendrik .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (05) :1037-1063
[8]   A validated strategy for side specific prediction of organ confined prostate cancer: A tool to select for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy [J].
Graefen, M ;
Haese, A ;
Pichlmeier, U ;
Hammerer, PG ;
Noldus, J ;
Butz, K ;
Erbersdobler, A ;
Henke, RP ;
Michl, U ;
Fernandez, S ;
Huland, H .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (03) :857-863
[9]   Outcome after radical prostatectomy with a pretreatment prostate biopsy Gleason score of ≥8 [J].
Manoharan, M ;
Bird, VG ;
Kim, SS ;
Civantos, F ;
Soloway, MS .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 92 (06) :539-544
[10]   Positive-block ratio in radical prostatectomy specimens is an independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen recurrence [J].
Marks, Rebecca A. ;
Lin, Haiqun ;
Koch, Michael O. ;
Cheng, Liang .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2007, 31 (06) :877-881