Sentence-structure priming in young children who do and do not stutter

被引:61
作者
Anderson, JD
Conture, EG
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Dept Speech & Hearing Sci, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Nashville, TN USA
来源
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH | 2004年 / 47卷 / 03期
关键词
stuttering; sentence-structure priming; syntactic priming; children; linguistic processing;
D O I
10.1044/1092-4388(2004/043)
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to use an age-appropriate version of the sentence-structure priming paradigm (e.g., K. Bock, 1990; K. Bock, H. Loebell, & R. Morey, 1992) to assess experimentally the syntactic processing abilities of children who stutter (CWS) and children who do not stutter (CWNS). Participants were 16 CWS and 16 CWNS between the ages of 3;3 (years; months) and 5;5, matched for gender and age (+/- 4 months). All participants had speech, language, and hearing development within normal limits, with the exception of stuttering for CWS. All children participated in a sentence-structure priming task where they were shown and asked to describe, on a computer screen, black-on-white line drawings of children, adults, and animals performing activities that could be appropriately described using simple active affirmative declarative (SAAD) sentences (e.g., "The man is walking the dog"). Speech reaction time (SRT) was measured from the onset of the picture presentation to the onset of the child's verbal response in the absence and presence of priming sentences, counterbalanced for order. Main findings indicated that CWS exhibited slower SRTs in the absence of priming sentences and greater syntactic-priming effects than CWNS. These findings suggest that CWS may have difficulty rapidly, efficiently planning and/or retrieving sentence-structure units, difficulties that may contribute to their inabilities to establish fluent speech-language production.
引用
收藏
页码:552 / 571
页数:20
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]   Language abilities of children who stutter: A preliminary study [J].
Anderson, JD ;
Conture, EG .
JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS, 2000, 25 (04) :283-304
[2]  
ANDERSON JD, 2001, UNPUB SENTENCE STRUC
[3]  
Andrews G., 1964, The syndrome of stuttering
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1982, Normality and Pathology in Cognitive Functions
[5]   Lexical and syntactic context and stuttering [J].
Au-Yeung, J ;
Howell, P .
CLINICAL LINGUISTICS & PHONETICS, 1998, 12 (01) :67-78
[6]  
Bloodstein O., 1995, A Handbook of Stuttering, V5th
[7]   SYNTACTIC PERSISTENCE IN LANGUAGE PRODUCTION [J].
BOCK, JK .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 18 (03) :355-387
[8]   FROM CONCEPTUAL ROLES TO STRUCTURAL RELATIONS - BRIDGING THE SYNTACTIC CLEFT [J].
BOCK, K ;
LOEBELL, H ;
MOREY, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1992, 99 (01) :150-171
[9]   CLOSED-CLASS IMMANENCE IN SENTENCE PRODUCTION [J].
BOCK, K .
COGNITION, 1989, 31 (02) :163-186
[10]   STRUCTURE IN LANGUAGE - CREATING FORM IN TALK [J].
BOCK, K .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1990, 45 (11) :1221-1236