Regenerative medicine as a therapeutic option for fecal incontinence: a systematic review of preclinical and clinical studies

被引:16
作者
De Ligny, Wiep R. [1 ]
Kerkhof, Manon H. [3 ]
Ruiz-Zapata, Alejandra M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Radboud Inst Mol Life Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Radboud Inst Mol Life Sci, Dept Urol, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Curilion Womens Hlth Clin, Dept Gynecol & Reconstruct Pelv Surg, Haarlem, Netherlands
关键词
animal models; cell therapy; fecal incontinence; human studies; regenerative medicine; scaffolds; tissue engineering; trophic factors; EXTERNAL ANAL-SPHINCTER; MESENCHYMAL STEM-CELLS; ARTIFICIAL BOWEL SPHINCTER; POLYCAPROLACTONE BEADS; AUTOLOGOUS MYOBLASTS; SKELETAL-MUSCLE; DOG-MODEL; SUCCESSFUL IMPLANTATION; INJECTION; INJURY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.009
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Fecal incontinence is the uncontrollable loss of stool and has a prevalence of around 7-15%. This condition has serious implications for patients' quality of life. Current treatment options show unsatisfactory results. A novel treatment option is therefore needed. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to perform a quality assessment and to give a critical overview of the current research available on regenerative medicine as a treatment for fecal incontinence. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic search strategy was applied in PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cinahl from inception until March of 2018. Studies were found relevant when the animals or patients in the studied group had objectively determined or induced fecal incontinence, and the intervention must have used any kind of cells, stem cells, or biocompatible material, with or without the use of trophic factors. Studies were screened on title and consecutively on abstract for relevance by 2 independent investigators. The risk of bias of preclinical studies was assessed using the SYstematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation risk of bias tool for animal studies, and for clinical studies the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials was used. RESULTS: In all, 34 preclinical studies and 5 clinical studies were included. Animal species, type of anal sphincter injury, intervention, and outcome parameters were heterogenous. Therefore, a meta-analysis could not be performed. The overall risk of bias of the included studies was high. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of regenerative medicine to treat fecal incontinence could not be determined due to the high risk of bias and heterogenicity of the available preclinical and clinical studies. The findings of this systematic review may result in improved study design of future studies, which could help the translation of regenerative medicine to the clinic as an alternative to current treatments for fecal incontinence.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / +
页数:15
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Potential of Human Umbilical Cord Matrix and Rabbit Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Repair of Surgically Incised Rabbit External Anal Sphincter [J].
Aghaee-afshar, Mahmoud ;
Rezazadehkermani, Mohammad ;
Asadi, Alireza ;
Malekpour-afshar, Reza ;
Shahesmaeili, Armita ;
Nematollahi-mahani, Seyed Noureddin .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2009, 52 (10) :1753-1761
[2]   How to obtain the P value from a confidence interval [J].
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Bland, J. Martin .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 343
[3]   Disappointing long-term results of the artificial anal sphincter for faecal incontinence [J].
Altomare, DF ;
Binda, GA ;
Dodi, G ;
La Torre, F ;
Romano, G ;
Rinaldi, M ;
Melega, E .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 91 (10) :1352-1353
[4]   Multicentre retrospective analysis of the outcome of artificial anal sphincter implantation for severe faecal incontinence [J].
Altomare, DF ;
Dodi, G ;
La Torre, F ;
Romano, G ;
Melega, E ;
Rinaldi, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (11) :1481-1486
[5]  
[Anonymous], ACUPUNCT MED
[6]   DYNAMIC GRACILOPLASTY FOR TREATMENT OF FECAL INCONTINENCE [J].
BAETEN, CGMI ;
KONSTEN, J ;
SPAANS, F ;
VISSER, R ;
HABETS, AMMC ;
BOURGEOIS, IM ;
WAGENMAKERS, AJM ;
SOETERS, PB .
LANCET, 1991, 338 (8776) :1163-1165
[7]   Neosphincter surgery for fecal incontinence:: A critical and unbiased review of the relevant literature [J].
Belyaev, O ;
Müller, C ;
Uhl, W .
SURGERY TODAY, 2006, 36 (04) :295-303
[8]   Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Classification of Fecal Incontinence: State of the Science Summary for the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) Workshop [J].
Bharucha, Adil E. ;
Dunivan, Gena ;
Goode, Patricia S. ;
Lukacz, Emily S. ;
Markland, Alayne D. ;
Matthews, Catherine A. ;
Mott, Louise ;
Rogers, Rebecca G. ;
Zinsmeister, Alan R. ;
Whitehead, William E. ;
Rao, Satish S. C. ;
Hamilton, Frank A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 110 (01) :127-136
[9]   Restoration of Anal Sphincter Function After Myoblast Cell Therapy in Incontinent Rats [J].
Bisson, Aurelie ;
Freret, Manuel ;
Drouot, Laurent ;
Jean, Laetitia ;
Le Corre, Stephanie ;
Gourcerol, Guillaume ;
Doucet, Christelle ;
Michot, Francis ;
Boyer, Olivier ;
Lamacz, Marek .
CELL TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 24 (02) :277-286
[10]   Successful Treatment of Passive Fecal Incontinence in an Animal Model Using Engineered Biosphincters: A 3-Month Follow-Up Study [J].
Bohl, Jaime L. ;
Zakhem, Elie ;
Bitar, Khalil N. .
STEM CELLS TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2017, 6 (09) :1795-1802