Validation of the Robustness of the Selection of the Preferred Design Concept through a Comprehensive Sensitivity Analysis

被引:0
作者
Sols, Alberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Hgsk Buskerud & Vestfold Univ, Norwegian Inst Syst Engn, Kongsberg, Norway
来源
2015 9TH ANNUAL IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (SYSCON) | 2015年
关键词
robust; design concept; selection; optimization; sensitivity analysis; systems approach; SYSTEMS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The selection of the preferred design concept is a crucial step in the systems engineering framework. After the identified need or opportunity has been translated into stakeholder requirements, and after as many as possible potential solutions or design concepts have been identified, the optimum one is to be selected. The traditional approach is to choose the design concept that promises to result in the system that better meets the stated requirements. The problem is that frequently the selection is not confirmed to be robust, which eventually means that the system will not achieve the effectiveness desired by the customer. This paper proposes a comprehensive sensitivity analysis to ensure the robustness of the selected design concept. The selection is normally made with the aid of mathematical models, whose inputs are subjective and/or just reasonably accurate predictions. Ensuring that the output of the model is not affected by reasonable changes in the inputs is essential, yet this aspect is far too often neglected because of lack of awareness of its importance or even because of knowledge on how to actually do it. This paper stresses the importance of rightly conducting this so critical step in the systems engineering framework and shows a four-step approach to performing a comprehensive sensitivity analysis. A simple example is presented to illustrate the proposed approach.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 408
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1986, Introduction to quality engineering: designing quality into products and processes
[2]   Designing systems for adaptability by means of architecture options [J].
Engel, Avner ;
Browning, Tyson R. .
SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2008, 11 (02) :125-146
[3]  
Fowlkes WY., 1995, Engineering Methods for Robust Product Design: Using Taguchi Methods in Technology and Product Development, V1
[4]   Design for changeability (DfC): Principles to enable changes in systems throughout their entire lifecycle [J].
Fricke, Ernst ;
Schulz, Armin P. .
Systems Engineering, 2005, 8 (04) :no
[5]  
Jilla C., 2002, 9 AIAA ISSMO S MULT, DOI [10.2514/6.2002-5491, DOI 10.2514/6.2002-5491]
[6]  
Phadke M.S., 1995, QUALITY ENG USING RO
[7]  
Ranjit K.R., 2001, DESIGN EXPT USING TA
[8]  
Richards M.G., 2009, Multi-attribute tradespace exploration for survivability
[9]  
Rogers M.G., 2000, Electre and Decision Support Methods and Applications in Engineering and Infrastructure Investment, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4757-5057-7, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-5057-7]
[10]  
Ross AdamM., 2003, Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration with Concurrent Design as a Value-Centric Framework for Space System Architecture and Design