Changes in Intraocular Pressure and Factors that Influence such Changes after FS-LASIK and SMILE

被引:0
作者
Kim, Bu Ki [1 ]
Chung, Young Taek [2 ]
机构
[1] Onnuri Smile Eye Clin, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Onnuri Eye Hosp, 325 Baekje Daero, Jeonju 54972, South Korea
来源
JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY | 2021年 / 62卷 / 10期
关键词
Femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis; Intraocular pressure; Small incision lenticule extraction; OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA; FEMTOSECOND LASER; PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY; TONOMETERS; DEPTH;
D O I
10.3341/jkos.2021.62.10.1355
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: We compared the intraocular pressure (IOP) changes and the relationships thereof with corneal biomechanics after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK). Methods: A total of 234 eyes of 117 patients who underwent FS-LASIK surgery and 244 eyes of 122 patients who underwent SMILE surgery were included in this retrospective study. Data were collected preoperatively, and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-operatively, including IOP measured via non-contract tonometry, central corneal thickness (CCT), and mean keratometry (Km), flat keratometry (Kf), and steep keratometry (Ks) data obtained using a dual Scheimpflug analyzer. Between-group differences were compared. Simple linear regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between changes in the IOP and the various parameters. Results: The IOP changes were 5.41 +/- 2.28 mmHg in the FS-LASIK group and 4.77 +/- 2.38 mmHg in the SMILE group, thus significantly different (p = 0.004). The IOP did not change significantly from 1 to 6 months after FS-LASIK but increased significantly from 12.07 +/- 1.77 mmHg at 3 months postoperatively to 12.77 +/- 1.89 mmHg at 6 months postoperatively after SMILE (p = 0.002). All of the preoperative spherical equivalent and IOP, and changes in the Km, Kf, Ks, and CCT, were significantly associated with the IOP changes in both groups. The preoperative IOP evidenced the strongest relationship with the IOP changes in both groups (R-2 = 0.414 in the FS-LASIK group, R-2 = 0.292 in the SMILE group). Conclusions: The IOP fell significantly after FS-LASIK and SMILE surgery, significantly more so after FS-LASIK than SMILE. The preoperative IOP exhibited the greatest influence on the IOP decreases after both FS-LASIK and SMILE.
引用
收藏
页码:1355 / 1363
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   3D Collagen Orientation Study of the Human Cornea Using X-ray Diffraction and Femtosecond Laser Technology [J].
Abahussin, Mohammad ;
Hayes, Sally ;
Cartwright, Nathaniel E. Knox ;
Kamma-Lorger, Christina S. ;
Khan, Yasir ;
Marshall, John ;
Meek, Keith M. .
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2009, 50 (11) :5159-5164
[2]   10-Year Results of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction [J].
Blum, Marcus ;
Lauer, Anna S. ;
Kunert, Kathleen S. ;
Sekundo, Walter .
JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 35 (10) :618-623
[3]   Comparison of Intraocular Pressure before and after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Refractive Surgery Measured with Perkins Tonometry, Noncontact Tonometry, and Transpalpebral Tonometry [J].
Cacho, Isabel ;
Sanchez-Naves, Juan ;
Batres, Laura ;
Pintor, Jesus ;
Carracedo, Gonzalo .
JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 2015
[4]   Effects of Variation in Depth and Side Cut Angulations in LASIK and Thin-flap LASIK Using a Femtosecond Laser: A Biomechanical Study [J].
Cartwright, Nathaniel E. Knox ;
Tyrer, John R. ;
Jaycock, Philip D. ;
Marshall, John .
JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 28 (06) :419-425
[5]   Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group [J].
Chen, Min ;
Zhang, Lina ;
Xu, Jia ;
Chen, Xinyi ;
Gu, Yuxiang ;
Ren, Yuping ;
Wang, Kaijun .
BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 19 (01)
[6]   Effectiveness of 4 tonometers in measuring IOP after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK, SMILE, and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy [J].
Chen, ShiHao ;
Lopes, Bernardo T. ;
Huang, Wei ;
Zheng, XiaoBo ;
Wang, JunJie ;
Zhu, Rong ;
Vinciguerra, Riccardo ;
Li, YiYu ;
Wang, QinMei ;
Li, HuiRong ;
Bao, FangJun ;
Elsheikh, Ahmed .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 46 (07) :967-974
[7]   The preoperative intraocular pressure level predicts the amount of underestimated intraocular pressure after LASIK for myopia [J].
Chihara, E ;
Takahashi, H ;
Okazaki, K ;
Park, M ;
Tanito, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 89 (02) :160-164
[8]   Severe myopia as a risk factor for progressive visual field loss in primary open-angle glaucoma [J].
Chihara, E ;
Liu, X ;
Dong, J ;
Takashima, Y ;
Akimoto, M ;
Hangai, M ;
Kuriyama, S ;
Tanihara, H ;
Hosoda, M ;
Tsukahara, S .
OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 1997, 211 (02) :66-71
[9]   Comparison of the performance of the Nidek NT-2000 noncontact tonometer with the Keeler Pulsair 2000 and the Goldmann applanation tonometer [J].
Cho, P ;
Lui, T .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1997, 74 (01) :51-58
[10]   Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser LASIK: comparison of corneal wound healing and inflammation [J].
Dong, Zixian ;
Zhou, Xingtao ;
Wu, Jihong ;
Zhang, Zhehuan ;
Li, Tao ;
Zhou, Zimei ;
Zhang, Shenghai ;
Li, Gang .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 98 (02) :263-269