Early stage decision support for sustainable building renovation - A review

被引:151
作者
Nielsen, Anne N. [1 ]
Jensen, Rasmus L. [2 ]
Larsen, Tine S. [2 ]
Nissen, Soren B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Northern Denmark UCN, Environm & Energy Dept, Sofiendalsvej 60, DK-9200 Aalborg SV, Denmark
[2] Aalborg Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Sofiendalsvej 9-11, DK-9200 Aalborg SV, Denmark
[3] Univ Coll Northern Denmark UCN, Architectural Technol & Construct Management, Sofiendalsvej 60, DK-9200 Aalborg SV, Denmark
关键词
Decision support tools; Multi-criteria decision-making; Sustainability assessment; Existing buildings; LIFE-CYCLE; EUROPEAN DIAGNOSIS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; DESIGN; TOOL; OPTIMIZATION; METHODOLOGY; CONSTRUCTION; SYSTEM; TOBUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.04.009
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Decision support tools for building renovation are important as assistance to professional building owners when setting goals for sustainability, and for making sure that the objectives are met throughout the design process, both when renovating a single building or choosing renovation actions within a building portfolio. Existing literature on decision support tools applicable in the pre-design and design phase of renovation projects have been reviewed, with the aim of providing a state-of-the-art overview. The paper categorizes the tools into six areas in which they can support the decision makers in the renovation process: in setting sustainability goals, weighting criteria, building diagnosis, generation of design alternatives, estimation of performance, and in the evaluation of design alternatives. These six areas are unfolded throughout the paper, along with examples and discussion of the applicability of the tools in the corresponding areas of the renovation process. The study presents perspectives on the future development of decision support tools in renovation projects, including the aspect of renovating multiple buildings. Areas for future research are suggested, such as emphasizing the aspect of choosing and weighting sustainability criteria, providing explicit guidelines for screening the existing building(s), and prioritizing renovation actions within a building portfolio. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 181
页数:17
相关论文
共 79 条
  • [1] Selection of renovation actions using multi-criteria "knapsack" model
    Alanne, K
    [J]. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 13 (03) : 377 - 391
  • [2] Alanne K, 2003, P 8 INT IBPSA C EIND, P55
  • [3] Sustainable building assessment tool development approach
    Alyami, Saleh H.
    Rezgui, Yacine
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2012, 5 : 52 - 62
  • [4] Andresen I., 2000, MULTICRITERIA DECISI
  • [5] [Anonymous], ARCHIT RES
  • [6] Comparing AHP and CBA as Decision Methods to Resolve the Choosing Problem in Detailed Design
    Arroyo, P.
    Tommelein, I. D.
    Ballard, G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 141 (01)
  • [7] Balaras C., 2002, 33 INT HVAC C, P20
  • [8] Balcomb J.D., 2000, Proceedings of the Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, V1, P528, DOI 10.1109/IECEC.2000.870762
  • [9] Bazerman MaxH., 1998, JUDGMENT MANAGERIAL
  • [10] Bengtsson M., 2001, J IND ECOL, V4, P47, DOI [10.1162/10881980052541945, DOI 10.1162/10881980052541945]