Bayesian pollution source identification via an inverse physics model

被引:8
作者
Hwang, Youngdeok [1 ]
Kim, Hang J. [2 ]
Chang, Won [2 ]
Yeo, Kyongmin [3 ]
Kim, Yongku [4 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Stat, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Div Stat & Data Sci, Cincinnati, OH USA
[3] IBM TJ Watson Res Ctr, Yorktown Hts, NY USA
[4] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Dept Stat, Daegu, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Dispersion model; Finite difference approximation; Markov random field; Numerical weather prediction model; Uncertainty quantification; CALIBRATION; REGRESSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.csda.2018.12.003
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The behavior of air pollution is governed by complex dynamics in which the air quality of a site is affected by the pollutants transported from neighboring locations via physical processes. To estimate the sources of observed pollution, it is crucial to take the atmospheric conditions into account. Traditional approaches to building empirical models use observations, but do not extensively incorporate physical knowledge. Failure to exploit such knowledge can be critically limiting, particularly in situations where near-real-time estimation of a pollution source is necessary. A Bayesian method is proposed to estimate the locations and relative contributions of pollution sources by incorporating both the physical knowledge of fluid dynamics and observed data. The proposed method uses a flexible approach to statistically utilize large-scale data from a numerical weather prediction model while integrating the dynamics of the physical processes into the model. This method is illustrated with a real wind data set. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 92
页数:17
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Large-Scale Inverse Problems and Quantification of Uncertainty
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Hierarchical Modelling and Analysis for Spatial Data
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, WHO AIR QUALITY GUID
[4]  
BROOK D, 1964, BIOMETRIKA, V51, P481
[5]   Learning about physical parameters: the importance of model discrepancy [J].
Brynjarsdottir, Jenny ;
O'Hagan, Anthony .
INVERSE PROBLEMS, 2014, 30 (11)
[6]   Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other components of the models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system [J].
Byun, Daewon ;
Schere, Kenneth L. .
APPLIED MECHANICS REVIEWS, 2006, 59 (1-6) :51-77
[7]   A validation of FEM3MP with Joint Urban 2003 data [J].
Chan, Stevens T. ;
Leach, Martin J. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY, 2007, 46 (12) :2127-2146
[8]   Model Calibration Through Minimal Adjustments [J].
Chang, Chia-Jung ;
Joseph, V. Roshan .
TECHNOMETRICS, 2014, 56 (04) :474-482
[9]   A COMPOSITE LIKELIHOOD APPROACH TO COMPUTER MODEL CALIBRATION WITH HIGH-DIMENSIONAL SPATIAL DATA [J].
Chang, Won ;
Haran, Murali ;
Olson, Roman ;
Keller, Klaus .
STATISTICA SINICA, 2015, 25 (01) :243-259
[10]   Measurement error models in chemical mass balance analysis of air quality data [J].
Christensen, WF ;
Gunst, RF .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 38 (05) :733-744