Selections of the cylinder implant neck taper and implant end fillet for optimal biomechanical properties: A three-dimensional finite element analysis

被引:31
作者
Kong, Liang [1 ]
Sun, Yingying [1 ]
Hu, Kaijin
Liu, Yanpu
Li, Dehua [2 ]
Qiu, Zhihui [3 ]
Liu, Baolin
机构
[1] Fourth Mil Med Univ, Sch Stomatol, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Xian 710072, Peoples R China
[2] Fourth Mil Med Univ, Sch Stomatol, Dept Implantol, Xian 710072, Peoples R China
[3] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Engn Mech, Xian 710000, Peoples R China
关键词
dental implant; stress; taper of implant neck; fillet of implant end; three-dimensional finite element analysis; optimum selection;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.12.013
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
In this paper, effects of the implant neck taper and the implant-end fillet on the maximum Von Mises stresses were evaluated in jaw bones, and maximum displacements examined in an implant-abutment complex by a finite element method (FEM). The implant-neck tapers (T) ranged from 45 degrees to 70 degrees, and fillets of implant ends (R) ranged from 0.5 to 1.5 mm. Results suggested that under axial load by the maximum Von Mises stresses in cortical and cancellous bones decreased by 71.6% and 14.8%, respectively, and under 45 degrees buccolinaual load by 68.2% and 11.0%, respectively. The maximum displacement of implant-abutment complex decreased by 9.1 % and 22.8% under axial and 45 degrees buccolingual load, respectively. When T ranged from 64 degrees to 73 degrees and R exceeded 0.8 mm, minimum stress/displacement was obtained and the evaluating targets were more sensitive to T than to R. Data indicated that the taper of implant neck favored stress distribution in cortical bones more than the fillet of implant end did; taper of implant neck affected implant stability more than the fillet of implant end did; and the taper of implant neck of 64-73 degrees and fillet of implant end exceeding 0.8 mm were optimal selections for the type B/2 bone in a cylinder implant by biomechanical consideration. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1124 / 1130
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] BRUNSKI J B, 1992, Clinical Materials, V10, P153, DOI 10.1016/0267-6605(92)90049-Y
  • [2] BRUNSKI JB, 1998, ADV DENTAL RES, V13, P99
  • [3] Evaluation of design parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis
    Chun, HJ
    Cheong, SY
    Han, JH
    Heo, SJ
    Chung, JP
    Rhyu, IC
    Choi, YC
    Baik, HK
    Ku, Y
    Kim, MH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2002, 29 (06) : 565 - 574
  • [4] Clift S E, 1995, Proc Inst Mech Eng H, V209, P139, DOI 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1995_209_336_02
  • [5] Colling E.W., 1984, The Physical Metallurgy of Titanium Alloys
  • [6] Cullinane DM., 2002, Principles of Bone Biology
  • [7] Gotfredsen K, 2000, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, V2, P120, DOI 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00002.x
  • [8] HANS VO, 1998, CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, V9, P407
  • [9] Holmgren E P, 1998, J Oral Implantol, V24, P80, DOI 10.1563/1548-1336(1998)024<0080:EPOODI>2.3.CO
  • [10] 2