Induced Membrane Technique for the Treatment of Infected Forearm Nonunion: A Retrospective Study

被引:6
|
作者
Ma, Xiang-Yu [1 ]
Liu, Bing [1 ]
Yu, Hai-Long [1 ]
Zhang, Xi [2 ]
Xiang, Liang-Bi [1 ]
Zhou, Da-Peng [1 ]
机构
[1] Gen Hosp Northern Theater Command, Dept Orthoped, Shenyang 110016, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] Gen Hosp Northern Theater Command, Dept Nutr, Shenyang, Liaoning, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME | 2022年 / 47卷 / 06期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Bone defect; forearm; induced membrane; infected nonunion; Masquelet technique; SEGMENTAL BONE DEFECTS; DIAPHYSEAL FRACTURES; PLATE FIXATION; RECONSTRUCTION; GRAFT; OSTEOMYELITIS; PREVENTION; MANAGEMENT; TRANSPORT; IMPLANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.06.019
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Infected forearm nonunion remains a challenge for the hand surgeon. Autologous bone grafting within an induced membrane following implantation of a cement spacer, also known as the Masquelet technique, is a procedure used for addressing segmental bone defects. This report summarized our experience using this technique to treat the infected forearm nonunion. Methods We retrospectively reviewed a series of 32 patients treated for infected forearm nonunion by the 2-stage Masquelet technique between 2009 and 2018. There was an infected nonunion of the ulna in 28 patients and an infected nonunion of the radius in 4 patients. All patients had undergone an average of 2.7 procedures before presenting at our institution. Treatment involved a staged procedure in which an antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer was implanted into the bone defect following debridement without internal fixation. It was left in place for 4-6 weeks, during which time a membrane formed around the cement spacer. In the second stage, the induced membrane was incised, and the cement spacer was removed. The defect was then filled with cancellous autograft with the addition of internal fixation. Postoperative radiographs were taken for the evaluation of bone healing. The functional results of the affected forearm were evaluated for motion loss of elbow or wrist and rotation loss of forearm. Results All nonunions healed without recurrent infection or loosening of internal fixation at the time of final follow-up. All the patients showed substantial functional improvement, with excellent results in 14 patients, satisfactory results in 13, and unsatisfactory results in 5. Conclusions The induced membrane technique is an effective solution for infected forearm nonunion. (Copyright (C) 2022 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. All rights reserved.)
引用
收藏
页码:583.e1 / 583.e9
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Induced membrane technique in the treatment of infected tibial bone defect: A retrospective study
    Yang, Yang
    Zhang, Wei
    Ou, Shuanji
    Xu, Changpeng
    Qi, Yong
    Ma, Xiangyang
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (28) : E34280
  • [2] Bone transport for the treatment of infected forearm nonunion
    Zhang, Qun
    Yin, Peng
    Hao, Ming
    Li, Jia
    Lv, Houchen
    Li, Tongtong
    Zhang, Hao
    Wang, Guoqi
    Zhang, Lihai
    Tang, Peifu
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2014, 45 (12): : 1880 - 1884
  • [3] Management of Infected Nonunion of the Forearm by the Masquelet Technique
    Dhar, Shabir A.
    Dar, Tahir A.
    Mir, Naseer A.
    STRATEGIES IN TRAUMA AND LIMB RECONSTRUCTION, 2019, 14 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [4] Infected forearm nonunion treated by bone transport after debridement
    Liu, Tang
    Liu, Zhenyang
    Ling, Lin
    Zhang, Xiangsheng
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2013, 14
  • [5] Does the induced membrane have antibacterial properties? An experimental rat model of a chronic infected nonunion
    Roukoz, Sami
    El Khoury, Georges
    Saghbini, Elie
    Saliba, Ibrahim
    Khazzaka, Aline
    Rizkallah, Maroun
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2020, 44 (02) : 391 - 398
  • [6] Treatment strategies of defect nonunion with vascular damaged by induced membrane technique: Is two-stage treatment sufficient?
    Inci, Fatih
    Yildirim, Ahmet Ozgur
    Kocak, Cahit
    Yavuz, Ibrahim Alper
    Ceyhan, Erman
    Oken, Ozdamar Fuad
    Aksahin, Ertugrul
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2020, 51 (04): : 1103 - 1108
  • [7] Vascularized posterior interosseous pedicled bone grafting for infected forearm nonunion
    Kamrani, R. S.
    Farhoud, A.
    Nabian, M. H.
    Zanjani, L. O.
    Farzan, M.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2016, 41 (04) : 441 - 447
  • [8] Treatment of infected humeral shaft nonunion and presumed aseptic nonunion with positive intraoperative cultures: a retrospective single-center study
    Vanpoulle, Gaetan
    Jalaguier, Thomas
    Druel, Thibault
    Walch, Arnaud
    Gazarian, Aram
    Mathieu, Laurent
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2024, 50 (06) : 2947 - 2954
  • [9] Management of forearm bone loss with induced membrane technique
    Bourgeois, M.
    Loisel, F.
    Bertrand, D.
    Nallet, J.
    Gindraux, F.
    Adam, A.
    Lepage, D.
    Sergent, P.
    Leclerc, G.
    Rondot, T.
    Garbuio, P.
    Obert, L.
    Pluvy, I.
    HAND SURGERY & REHABILITATION, 2020, 39 (03) : 171 - 177
  • [10] Comparison of free vascularized fibular grafts and the Masquelet technique for the treatment of segmental bone defects with open forearm fractures: a retrospective cohort study
    Zhou, Ming
    Ma, Yunhong
    Jia, Xueyuan
    Wu, Yongwei
    Liu, Jun
    Wang, Yapeng
    Wang, Peng
    Luo, Junhao
    Lin, Fang
    Wang, Jianbing
    Rui, Yongjun
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2024, 25 (01)