Comparison of perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic right upper lobectomy in non-small cell lung cancer

被引:24
|
作者
Huang, Jia [1 ]
Tian, Yu [1 ]
Zhou, Qian-Jun [1 ]
Ning, Jun-Wei [1 ]
Gu, Ze-Nan [1 ]
Lu, Pei-Ji [1 ]
Li, Jian-Tao [1 ]
Lin, Hao [1 ]
Chen, Tian-Xiang [1 ]
Yang, Yun-Hai [1 ]
Kim, Min P. [2 ]
Merritt, Robert E. [3 ]
Ghisalberti, Marco [4 ]
Jiang, Long [1 ]
Luo, Qing-Quan [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Chest Hosp, Shanghai Lung Canc Ctr, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Houston Methodist Hosp, Div Thorac Surg, Dept Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Dept Surg, Div Thorac Surg, Wexner Med Ctr, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[4] Univ Hosp Siena, Thorac Surg Unit, Siena, Italy
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Lobectomy; non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); robotic; video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS); THORACIC SURGICAL LOBECTOMY; SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES; SURGERY; RESECTION;
D O I
10.21037/tlcr-21-960
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has been widely used in the treatment of lung cancer. The perioperative outcomes of right upper lobectomy (RUL) using RATS and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) were retrospectively investigated and compared. We aimed to summarize a single-center experience of RATS and 4-port unidirectional VATS in RUL, and to discuss the safety and the essentials of the surgery. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the 685 with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who underwent minimally invasive RUL in our center by the same surgical group from January 2015 to December 2019. Both RATS and VATS were performed with three ports with utility incision. The 685 participants were divided into RATS (335 cases) and VATS (350 cases) groups according to surgical method. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes including dissected lymph nodes, postoperative duration of drainage, postoperative hospital stay, and incidence of postoperative complications were compared between the groups. Results: In the 685 patients enrolled, the baseline characteristics were comparable, and no postoperative 30-day mortality or intraoperative blood transfusion were observed. Compared with VATS, RATS had less surgical duration (90.22 +/- 12.16 vs. 92.68 +/- 12.26 min, P<0.001), less length of stay (4.71 +/- 1.37 vs. 5.26 +/- 1.56 days, P<0.001), and decreased postoperative duration of drainage (3.49 +/- 1.15 vs. 4.09 +/- 1.57 days, P<0.001). No significant difference was observed in the lymph nodes dissection, blood loss, conversion rate and morbidities. The cost of RATS was much higher than VATS (85,329.41 +/- 12,893.44 vs. 68,733.43 +/- 14,781.32 Conclusions: Robot assisted RUL had similar perioperative outcomes compared to VATS RUL lobectomy using similar three port with utility incision technique. The advantages of RATS included finer dissection of lymph node, relatively less operation time, earlier chest tube removal and discharge.
引用
收藏
页码:4549 / 4557
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Postoperative outcomes of robotic-assisted lobectomy in obese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer
    Casiraghi, Monica
    Sedda, Giulia
    Diotti, Cristina
    Mariolo, Alessio Vincenzo
    Galetta, Domenico
    Tessitore, Adele
    Maisonneuve, Patrick
    Spaggiari, Lorenzo
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 30 (03) : 359 - 365
  • [32] Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer
    Kim, Hyun Koo
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 55 (12): : 1193 - 1198
  • [33] Comparison of costs for video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy and open lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer
    Sukki Cho
    Young Woo Do
    Eung Bae Lee
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2011, 25 : 1054 - 1061
  • [34] Current status of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy in nodal positive non-small cell lung cancer
    Le, Nguyen M.
    Lee, Paul C.
    VIDEO-ASSISTED THORACIC SURGERY, 2018, 3
  • [35] Long-term outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy vs. thoracotomy lobectomy for stage IA non-small cell lung cancer
    Risa Oda
    Katsuhiro Okuda
    Satoshi Osaga
    Takuya Watanabe
    Tadashi Sakane
    Tsutomu Tatematsu
    Keisuke Yokota
    Hiroshi Haneda
    Ryoichi Nakanishi
    Surgery Today, 2019, 49 : 369 - 377
  • [36] Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic versus Open Lobectomy: Costs and Outcomes
    Rodgers-Fischl, Peter M.
    Martin, Jeremiah T.
    Saha, Sibu P.
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 110 (03) : 229 - 233
  • [37] Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy for locally advanced lung cancer
    Lin, Mong-Wei
    Kuo, Shuenn-Wen
    Yang, Shun-Mao
    Lee, Jang-Ming
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2016, 8 (07) : 1747 - 1752
  • [38] Comparison of treatment outcomes between single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomic segmentectomy and lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer of early-stage: a retrospective observational study
    Lin, Yuxing
    Zheng, Wei
    Zhu, Yong
    Guo, Zhaohui
    Zheng, Bin
    Chen, Chun
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2016, 8 (06) : 1290 - 1296
  • [39] Robotic and video-assisted lobectomy/segmentectomy for non-small cell lung cancer have similar perioperative outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mao, Junjie
    Tang, Zilong
    Mi, Yuan
    Xu, Haidi
    Li, Kuankuan
    Liang, Yuxiang
    Wang, Na
    Wang, Lei
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 10 (09) : 3883 - 3893
  • [40] Non-intubated versus intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer patients
    Yu, Jakraphan
    Tantraworasin, Apichat
    Laohathai, Sira
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 47 (01) : 402 - 406