A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparison of Outcomes of Robot-Assisted versus Open Partial Nephrectomy in Clinical T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients

被引:10
作者
Ni, Yixiu [1 ]
Yang, Xiaohua [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Urol, Jiande Branch, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Renal cell carcinoma; Partial nephrectomy; Robotic surgery; Open surgery; Meta-analysis; LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS; PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES; TUMORS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1159/000521881
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has been increasingly used for renal cell carcinoma in recent years. But the advantages of RARN over open partial nephrectomy (OPN) are still controversial. Methods: We searched the articles between 1997 and 2021 in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMbase databases. The parameters were perioperative outcomes including operating time (OT), warm ischemic time (WIT), estimated blood loss (EBL), positive surgical margin (PSM), preoperative and postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), length of stay (LOS), and intraoperative and postoperative complications. Stata 13.0 software was used for the meta-analysis. Results: Seven studies with 2,646 patients (1,285 in RAPN vs. 1,361 in OPN) were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in OT (WMD [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.14 [-0.33, 0.61], p = 0.570); WIT (WMD [95% CI]:0.28 [-0.13, 0.69], p = 0.187); PSM (odds ratio [OR] [95% CI]: 1.04 [0.37, 2.94], p = 0.944); preoperative eGFR (OR [95% CI]: 0.11 [-0.01, 0.23], p = 0.071); postoperative eGFR (OR [95% CI]: -0.11 [0.27, 0.04], p = 0.159); and intraoperative complications (OR [95% CI]: 0.13 [0.02, 1.04], p = 0.055) between 2 groups. But there were still less EBL (WMD [95% CI]: -0.67 [-1.07, -0.28], p = 0.001), shorter LOS (WMD [95% CI]: -1.09 [-1.86, -0.32], p = 0.005) and fewer postoperative complications (OR [95% CI]: 0.51 [0.38, 0.68], p = 0.000). Conclusions: Compared with OPN, RAPN appears to achieve partly similar short-term functional outcomes. Meanwhile, some results are inconsistent with previous studies which seem to show that tumor type is also an important factor in comparison between RAPN and OPN, but the analysis is not carried out due to lack of complete data. Therefore, more high-quality random controlled trials are acquired. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 767
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Partial Nephrectomy, a Comparison between Different Modalities: A Tertiary Care Center Experience [J].
Al Asker, Ahmed ;
Addar, Abdulmalik ;
Alghamdi, Mohammed ;
Alawad, Saud ;
Alharbi, Mohammed ;
Bin Hamri, Saeed ;
Albqami, Nasser ;
Alkhayal, Abdullah ;
Alrabeeah, Khaled .
JOURNAL OF KIDNEY CANCER AND VHL, 2021, 8 (02) :34-39
[2]   Extreme Markup: The Fifty US Hospitals With The Highest Charge-To-Cost Ratios [J].
Bai, Ge ;
Anderson, Gerard F. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2015, 34 (06) :922-928
[3]   Evaluating the impact of surgical supply cost variation during partial nephrectomy on patient outcomes [J].
Balakrishnan, Ashwin S. ;
Hampson, Lindsay A. ;
Bell, Alexander M. ;
Baghdanian, Arthur H. ;
Baghdanian, Armonde A. ;
Meng, Maxwell V. ;
Odisho, Anobel Y. .
TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2021, 10 (02) :765-+
[4]   Retroperitoneal Robot-Assisted Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy for cT1 Renal Tumors: A Matched-Pair Comparison of Perioperative and Early Oncological Outcomes [J].
Borghesi, Marco ;
Schiavina, Riccardo ;
Chessa, Francesco ;
Bianchi, Lorenzo ;
La Manna, Gaetano ;
Porreca, Angelo ;
Brunocilla, Eugenio .
CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2018, 16 (02) :E391-E396
[5]   Positive Surgical Margins After Nephron-Sparing Surgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Incidence, Clinical Impact, and Management [J].
Borghesi, Marco ;
Brunocilla, Eugenio ;
Schiavina, Riccardo ;
Martorana, Giuseppe .
CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2013, 11 (01) :5-9
[6]   Robotic versus open urological oncological surgery: study protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Cacciamani, Giovanni E. ;
Gill, Karanvir ;
Gill, Inderbir S. .
BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (02)
[7]   Renal Mass and Localized Renal Cancer: AUA Guideline [J].
Campbell, Steven ;
Uzzo, Robert G. ;
Allaf, Mohamad E. ;
Bass, Eric B. ;
Cadeddu, Jeffrey A. ;
Chang, Anthony ;
Clark, Peter E. ;
Davis, Brian J. ;
Derweesh, Ithaar H. ;
Giambarresi, Leo ;
Gervais, Debra A. ;
Hu, Susie L. ;
Lane, Brian R. ;
Leibovich, Bradley C. ;
Pierorazio, Philip M. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 198 (03) :520-529
[8]   Epidemiology of Renal Cell Carcinoma [J].
Capitanio, Umberto ;
Bensalah, Karim ;
Bex, Axel ;
Boorjian, Stephen A. ;
Bray, Freddie ;
Coleman, Jonathan ;
Gore, John L. ;
Sun, Maxine ;
Wood, Christopher ;
Russo, Paul .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 75 (01) :74-84
[9]   Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Choi, Ji Eun ;
You, Ji Hye ;
Kim, Dae Keun ;
Rha, Koon Ho ;
Lee, Seon Heui .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 67 (05) :891-901
[10]   Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy is associated with early recovery of renal function: Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy using DTPA renal scintigraphy [J].
Choi, Se Young ;
Jung, Han ;
You, Dalsan ;
Jeong, In Gab ;
Song, Cheryn ;
Hong, Bumsik ;
Hong, Jun Hyuk ;
Ahn, Hanjong ;
Kim, Choung-Soo .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 119 (07) :1016-1023