Genetic characterization of raspberry cultivars using molecular markers

被引:3
作者
Fernandez, M. P. [1 ]
Hernaiz, S. [1 ]
Ibanez, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Madrileno Invest & Desarrollo Rural, Agr & Alimentario IMIDRA Finca Encin, Alcala De Henares 28800, Spain
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IXTH INTERNATIONAL RUBUS AND RIBES SYMPOSIUM | 2008年 / 777期
关键词
Rubus; RAPDs; SSRs; genetic diversity; plant breeder rights; MICROSATELLITE MARKERS; RAPD MARKERS; SSR MARKERS; IDENTIFICATION; DIVERSITY; FINGERPRINTS; VARIETIES; RFLPS; AFLPS;
D O I
10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.777.16
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Molecular (DNA) markers have some advantages over morphological markers for identification purposes and for estimating genetic diversity. In this study we have used two types of molecular markers to characterize a collection of 36 raspberry cultivars: Ten RAPD primers and seven microsatellite (SSR) loci were used. The collection included commercial cultivars, very closely related because some cultivars have been recurrently used in many breeding programs. Even though, both kind of markers (RAPD and SSR) could distinguish all cultivars, although SSR data showed higher polymorphism than RAPD data. Since this and for other reasons (simplicity, possibility of automation, multiplexation, etc.), microsatellite markers are preferable. Cluster analysis using RAPD and SSR data was used to examine genetic relationships within the collection. Results closely resembled pedigree relations between cultivars, and cultivars with similar origins or belonging to the same breeding program were grouped together in the same cluster. The obtained results confirmed the utility of RAPD and SSR markers to discriminate among closely related raspberries and to determine the genetic diversity among cultivars. This information is useful for germplasm characterization and identification of cultivars, including legal issues like assessing infringements on plant breeders' rights.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 132
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [21] Citrus phylogeny and genetic origin of important species as investigated by molecular markers
    Nicolosi, E
    Deng, ZN
    Gentile, A
    La Malfa, S
    Continella, G
    Tribulato, E
    [J]. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2000, 100 (08) : 1155 - 1166
  • [22] MINISATELLITE DNA FINGERPRINTS CAN DISTINGUISH RUBUS CULTIVARS AND ESTIMATE THEIR DEGREE OF RELATEDNESS
    NYBOM, H
    HALL, HK
    [J]. EUPHYTICA, 1991, 53 (02) : 107 - 114
  • [23] IDENTIFICATION OF RASPBERRY CULTIVARS BY RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA (RAPD) ANALYSIS
    PARENT, JG
    FORTIN, MG
    PAGE, D
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1993, 73 (04) : 1115 - 1122
  • [24] IDENTIFICATION OF RASPBERRY CULTIVARS BY NONRADIOACTIVE DNA FINGERPRINTING
    PARENT, JG
    PAGE, D
    [J]. HORTSCIENCE, 1992, 27 (10) : 1108 - 1110
  • [25] Comparative analysis of genetic similarity among maize inbred lines detected by RFLPs, RAPDs, SSRs, and AFLPs
    Pejic, I
    Ajmone-Marsan, P
    Morgante, M
    Kozumplick, V
    Castiglioni, P
    Taramino, G
    Motto, M
    [J]. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1998, 97 (08) : 1248 - 1255
  • [26] The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis
    Powell, W
    Morgante, M
    Andre, C
    Hanafey, M
    Vogel, J
    Tingey, S
    Rafalski, A
    [J]. MOLECULAR BREEDING, 1996, 2 (03) : 225 - 238
  • [27] Direct comparison of levels of genetic variation among barley accessions detected by RFLPs, AFLPs, SSRs and RAPDs
    Russell, JR
    Fuller, JD
    Macaulay, M
    Hatz, BG
    Jahoor, A
    Powell, W
    Waugh, R
    [J]. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1997, 95 (04) : 714 - 722
  • [28] HYPERVARIABILITY OF SIMPLE SEQUENCES AS A GENERAL SOURCE FOR POLYMORPHIC DNA MARKERS
    TAUTZ, D
    [J]. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1989, 17 (16) : 6463 - 6471
  • [29] DNA POLYMORPHISMS AMPLIFIED BY ARBITRARY PRIMERS ARE USEFUL AS GENETIC-MARKERS
    WILLIAMS, JGK
    KUBELIK, AR
    LIVAK, KJ
    RAFALSKI, JA
    TINGEY, SV
    [J]. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1990, 18 (22) : 6531 - 6535
  • [30] Zebrowska JI, 2003, J FOOD AGRIC ENVIRON, V1, P115