Large eddy simulation of a bubble column using dynamic sub-grid scale model

被引:87
作者
Dhotre, M. T. [1 ]
Niceno, B. [1 ]
Smith, B. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Paul Scherrer Inst, Thermal Hydraul Lab, Nucl Energy & Safety Dept, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland
关键词
LES; RANS; bubble column; bubbly flow; computational fluid dynamics;
D O I
10.1016/j.cej.2007.04.016
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Euler-Euler simulations of the gas-liquid flow in a square cross-sectioned bubble column with LES (two sub-grid scale models) and the k-epsilon model are presented. The sub-grid scale modeling is based on the Smagorinsky kernel in both its original form and the dynamic procedure of Germano. The attempt has been made to assess the performance of these two sub-grid scale models. The Smagorinsky model with model constant C-s = 0. 12 performs quite well, and gives results almost identical to those given by the dynamic procedure of Germano. The SGS models are modified to account for bubble induced turbulence (Sato model) and it is observed that it does not change the results much. Predictions are also compared with the available experimental data. All the non-drag forces (turbulent dispersion force (only for RANS), virtual mass force, lift force) and drag force were incorporated in the model. An extended k-epsilon turbulence model has been used with extra source terms introduced to account for the interaction between the bubbles and the liquid. Though both LES models showed agreement in predictions, the Germano model still can be used to have estimates of C-s value which are not known a priori. Moreover, if objective is to understand the steady and time averaged features, RANS can also perform well. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 348
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1978, BUBBLES DROPS PARTIC
[2]   Dynamic simulation of a 2D bubble column [J].
Bech, K .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2005, 60 (19) :5294-5304
[3]   Applicability of the standard k-ε turbulence model to the dynamic simulation of bubble columns.: Part II:: Comparison of detailed experiments and flow simulations [J].
Borchers, O ;
Busch, C ;
Sokolichin, A ;
Eigenberger, G .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1999, 54 (24) :5927-5935
[4]  
CACUCI DG, 2006, FISA
[5]   Large eddy simulation of the gas-liquid flow in a square cross-sectioned bubble column [J].
Deen, NG ;
Solberg, T ;
Hjertager, BH .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2001, 56 (21-22) :6341-6349
[6]  
DEEN NG, 2000, P 10 INT S APPL LAS
[7]   A three-dimensional CFD model for gas-liquid bubble columns [J].
Delnoij, E ;
Kuipers, JAM ;
van Swaaij, WPM .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1999, 54 (13-14) :2217-2226
[8]   THE VIRTUAL MASS AND LIFT FORCE ON A SPHERE IN ROTATING AND STRAINING INVISCID FLOW [J].
DREW, DA ;
LAHEY, RT .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPHASE FLOW, 1987, 13 (01) :113-121
[9]  
DREW DA, 1971, STUD APPL MATH, V50, P133
[10]   CFD simulations of bubble column reactors: 1D, 2D and 3D approach [J].
Ekambara, K ;
Dhotre, MT ;
Joshi, JB .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2005, 60 (23) :6733-6746