Addressing missing data in specification search in measurement invariance testing with Likert-type scale variables: A comparison of two approaches

被引:4
作者
Chen, Po-Yi [1 ]
Wu, Wei [2 ]
Brandt, Holger [3 ]
Jia, Fan [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Rio Grande Valley, Dept Psychol Sci, Edinburg, TX 78539 USA
[2] Indiana Univ Purdue Univ, Dept Psychol, Indianapolis, IN 46205 USA
[3] Univ Zurich, Dept Psychol, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Univ Calif Merced, Dept Psychol Sci, Merced, CA USA
关键词
Specification search; Partial invariance model; Ordinal missing data; Measurement invaraince; Modification index; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD-ESTIMATION; COVARIANCE STRUCTURE-ANALYSIS; PARTIAL FACTORIAL INVARIANCE; FACTOR-ANALYTIC TESTS; ROBUST CORRECTIONS; MODEL; IMPACT; PERFORMANCE; EQUIVALENCE;
D O I
10.3758/s13428-020-01415-2
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
In measurement invariance testing, when a certain level of full invariance is not achieved, the sequential backward specification search method with the largest modification index (SBSS_LMFI) is often used to identify the source of non-invariance. SBSS_LMFI has been studied under complete data but not missing data. Focusing on Likert-type scale variables, this study examined two methods for dealing with missing data in SBSS_LMFI using Monte Carlo simulation: robust full information maximum likelihood estimator (rFIML) and mean and variance adjusted weighted least squared estimator coupled with pairwise deletion (WLSMV_PD). The result suggests that WLSMV_PD could result in not only over-rejections of invariance models but also reductions of power to identify non-invariant items. In contrast, rFIML provided good control of type I error rates, although it required a larger sample size to yield sufficient power to identify non-invariant items. Recommendations based on the result were provided.
引用
收藏
页码:2567 / 2587
页数:21
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, PSYCHOMETRIKA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, ASSESSMENT, DOI DOI 10.1177/1073191117711020
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, ORGAN RES METHODS, DOI DOI 10.1177/109442810031002
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, International Journal of Quantitative Research in Education, DOI DOI 10.1504/IJQRE.2013.058310
[5]  
Arbuckle J. L., 1996, ADV STRUCTURAL EQUAT, P243, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315827414
[6]  
Asparouhov T, 2010, Bayesian analysis of latent variable models using Mplus, V2010, P5
[7]   Gender Differences in the Structure of Marital Quality [J].
Beam, Christopher R. ;
Marcus, Katherine ;
Turkheimer, Eric ;
Emery, Robert E. .
BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 2018, 48 (03) :209-223
[8]  
BELZAK W, 2020, PSYCHOL METHODS
[9]  
Bollen K. A., 1989, Structural equations with latent variables
[10]  
Brown T. A., 2015, Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research, V2nd