Community Participation in Disaster Recovery Programs: A Study of a Coastal Area in Bangladesh

被引:4
作者
Islam, Emadul [1 ,2 ]
Wahab, Haris Bin Abd [3 ]
Benson, Odessa Gonzalez [4 ]
机构
[1] Independent Univ Bangladesh, Ctr Bay Bengal Studies, Dhaka, Bangladesh
[2] Univ Malaya, Dept Social Adm & Justice, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[3] Univ Malaya, Dept Adm & Justice, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[4] Univ Michigan, U M Sch Social Work, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
Community participation; Sustainable disaster recovery; Community resilience; Bangladesh; POSTDISASTER RECOVERY; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION; CIVIL-SOCIETY; RESILIENCE; GOVERNANCE; EARTHQUAKE; MANAGEMENT; REDUCTION; FRAMEWORK; PROJECTS;
D O I
10.1057/s41287-021-00460-7
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This study explores disaster-affected local community participation in disaster recovery programs led by governmental organizations (GOs) and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Focusing on programming in response to the devastating cyclone Aila in the coastal areas in Bangladesh in 2009, the study employed a mixed-method approach using qualitative data (interviews and focus groups) and quantitative data (surveys). Quantitative findings reveal a moderate level of participation in all four stages (decision-making, implementation, benefit sharing, and evaluation) in GO and NGO recovery projects. Qualitative findings reveal that the decision-making process was controlled by project authorities, local elites, and power politics; community participation was limited to passive participation. Furthermore, findings suggest that GO-led programs as less effective in facilitating community participation, compared with NGO-led programs. Findings point to the need for policymakers and practitioners to view community participation not as a monolithic concept, but as a multi-dimensional, dynamic process that can be facilitated more effectively when disaster recovery programming and policies are targeted and intentional in aiming for partnerships and empowerment especially during decision-making phases of programming, rather than nominal forms of community participation. Further, findings call for comparative studies of GO-led and NGO-led programs to better understand organizational culture and institutional mechanisms and their differential impact on community participation during disaster recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:2438 / 2462
页数:25
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: An analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework [J].
Agarwal, B .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 29 (10) :1623-1648
[2]   Decentralization and participation: The governance of common pool resources in Nepal's Terai [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Gupta, K .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 33 (07) :1101-1114
[3]   Social, not physical, infrastructure: the critical role of civil society after the 1923 Tokyo earthquake [J].
Aldrich, Daniel P. .
DISASTERS, 2012, 36 (03) :398-419
[4]  
Allahdadi F, 2011, LIFE SCI J, V8, P577
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide, DOI [DOI 10.1787/9789264043466-EN, 10.1787/9789264043466-en, 10.1787/9789264043466-EN]
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2005, COMMUNITIES RECOVER
[7]   LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION [J].
ARNSTEIN, SR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, 1969, 35 (04) :216-224
[8]   A stakeholder approach to building community resilience: awareness to implementation [J].
Burnside-Lawry, Judy ;
Carvalho, Luis .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RESILIENCE IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 7 (01) :4-25
[9]   Digging deeper: participation and non-participation in post-disaster community recovery [J].
Chandrasekhar, Divya .
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 43 (05) :614-629
[10]   Public participation and the environment: Do we know what works? [J].
Chess, C ;
Purcell, K .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 33 (16) :2685-2692