Multiple Citation Indicators and Their Composite across Scientific Disciplines

被引:86
作者
Ioannidis, John P. A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Klavans, Richard [5 ]
Boyack, Kevin W. [6 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Meta Res Innovat Ctr Stanford METR, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Stanford Prevent Res Ctr, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Res & Policy, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Sch Humanities & Sci, Dept Stat, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[5] SciTech Strategies Inc, Wayne, PA USA
[6] SciTech Strategies Inc, Albuquerque, NM USA
关键词
H-INDEX; BIBLIOMETRIC INDICATORS; AUTHORSHIP; RESEARCHERS; SCIENCE; ORDER;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pbio.1002501
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Many fields face an increasing prevalence of multi-authorship, and this poses challenges in assessing citation metrics. Here, we explore multiple citation indicators that address total impact (number of citations, Hirsch H index [H]), co-authorship adjustment (Schreiber Hm index [Hm]), and author order (total citations to papers as single; single or first; or single, first, or last author). We demonstrate the correlation patterns between these indicators across 84,116 scientists (those among the top 30,000 for impact in a single year [2013] in at least one of these indicators) and separately across 12 scientific fields. Correlation patterns vary across these 12 fields. In physics, total citations are highly negatively correlated with indicators of co-authorship adjustment and of author order, while in other sciences the negative correlation is seen only for total citation impact and citations to papers as single author. We propose a composite score that sums standardized values of these six log-transformed indicators. Of the 1,000 top-ranked scientists with the composite score, only 322 are in the top 1,000 based on total citations. Many Nobel laureates and other extremely influential scientists rank among the top-1,000 with the composite indicator, but would rank much lower based on total citations. Conversely, many of the top 1,000 authors on total citations have had no single/first/last-authored cited paper. More Nobel laureates of 2011-2015 are among the top authors when authors are ranked by the composite score than by total citations, H index, or Hm index; 40/47 of these laureates are among the top 30,000 by at least one of the six indicators. We also explore the sensitivity of indicators to self-citation and alphabetic ordering of authors in papers across different scientific fields. Multiple indicators and their composite may give a more comprehensive picture of impact, although no citation indicator, single or composite, can be expected to select all the best scientists.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, WINNOWER
[2]   Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? [J].
Batista, Pablo D. ;
Campiteli, Monica G. ;
Kinouchi, Osame ;
Martinez, Alexandre S. .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2006, 68 (01) :179-189
[3]   Design and Update of a Classification System: The UCSD Map of Science [J].
Boerner, Katy ;
Klavans, Richard ;
Patek, Michael ;
Zoss, Angela M. ;
Biberstine, Joseph R. ;
Light, Robert P. ;
Lariviere, Vincent ;
Boyack, Kevin W. .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (07)
[4]   The state of h index research Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance? [J].
Bornmann, Lutz ;
Daniel, Hans-Dieter .
EMBO REPORTS, 2009, 10 (01) :2-6
[5]   Including cited non-source items in a large-scale map of science: What difference does it make? [J].
Boyack, Kevin W. ;
Klavans, Richard .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2014, 8 (03) :569-580
[6]   A list of highly influential biomedical researchers, 1996-2011 [J].
Boyack, Kevin W. ;
Klavans, Richard ;
Sorensen, Aaron A. ;
Ioannidis, John P. A. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2013, 43 (12) :1339-1365
[7]   Do age and professional rank influence the order of authorship in scientific publications? Some evidence from a micro-level perspective [J].
Costas, Rodrigo ;
Bordons, Maria .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2011, 88 (01) :145-161
[8]   Perceptions of author order versus contribution among researchers with different professional ranks and the potential of harmonic counts for encouraging ethical co-authorship practices [J].
Du Jian ;
Tang Xiaoli .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2013, 96 (01) :277-295
[9]   The Possible Role of Resource Requirements and Academic Career-Choice Risk on Gender Differences in Publication Rate and Impact [J].
Duch, Jordi ;
Zeng, Xiao Han T. ;
Sales-Pardo, Marta ;
Radicchi, Filippo ;
Otis, Shayna ;
Woodruff, Teresa K. ;
Amaral, Luis A. Nunes .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (12)
[10]   Mathematical theory of the h- and g-index in case of fractional counting of authorship [J].
Egghe, Leo .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 59 (10) :1608-1616