Embodied GHG Emissions of Wooden Buildings-Challenges of Biogenic Carbon Accounting in Current LCA Methods

被引:60
作者
Andersen, C. E. [1 ]
Rasmussen, F. N. [1 ]
Habert, G. [2 ]
Birgisdottir, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Dept Built Environm, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Construct & Infrastruct Management IBI, Chair Sustainable Construct, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
GHG emissions; wood; biogenic carbon; buildings; LCA; sustainability; case studies; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; CIRCULAR ECONOMY; RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; TIMBER BUILDINGS; ENERGY ANALYSIS; CONSTRUCTION; CONCRETE;
D O I
10.3389/fbuil.2021.729096
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Buildings play a vital role in reaching the targets stated by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees. Increasing the use of wood in construction is a proposed upcoming strategy to reduce the embodied greenhouse gas emissions of buildings. This study examines existing life cycle assessments of wooden buildings. The aim is to investigate embodied greenhouse gas emission results reported, as well as methodological approaches applied in existing literature. The study applies the protocol for Systematic Literature Reviews and finds 79 relevant papers. From the final sample, the study analyses 226 different scenarios in-depth in terms of embodied emissions, life cycle assessment method, life cycle inventory modelling and biogenic carbon approach. The analysis shows that the average reported values of embodied greenhouse gas emissions of wooden buildings are one-third to half of the embodied emissions reported from buildings in general. Additionally, from the analysis of the final sample we find that the majority of wooden building life cycle assessments apply similar methods and often leave out biogenic carbon from the assessment or simply do not declare it. This implies that the focus on variability in the different methods applied in wooden building life cycle assessments needs to be increased to establish the relationship between methodological choices and embodied emissions of wooden buildings. Further, transparency and conformity in biogenic carbon accounting in life cycle assessments is essential to enhance comparability between life cycle assessment studies and to avoid distortions in embodied GHG emission results.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 137 条
[1]  
Ajayi e.a., 2015, INT J SUSTAINABLE BU, V6, P14, DOI [10.1080/2093761x.2015.1006708, DOI 10.1080/2093761X.2015.1006708]
[2]   Comparison of GHG emissions from circular and conventional building components [J].
Andersen, Camilla Ernst ;
Kanafani, Kai ;
Zimmermann, Regitze Kjaer ;
Rasmussen, Freja Nygaard ;
Birgisdottir, Harpa .
BUILDINGS & CITIES, 2020, 1 (01) :379-392
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, UNI EN 15804
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5C
[6]  
[Anonymous], Democracy for Sustainable, Inclusive and Resilient Development
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Bringing embodied carbon upfront: coordinated action for the building and construction sector to tackle embodied carbon
[8]   Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy analysis of prefabricated reusable building modules [J].
Aye, Lu ;
Ngo, T. ;
Crawford, R. H. ;
Gammampila, R. ;
Mendis, P. .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2012, 47 :159-168
[9]   Strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from residential sector by proposing new building structures in hot and humid climatic conditions [J].
Balasbaneh, Ali Tighnavard ;
Bin Marsono, Abdul Kadir .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 124 :357-368
[10]   Comparing sources and analysis of uncertainty in consequential and attributional life cycle assessment: review of current practice and recommendations [J].
Bamber, Nicole ;
Turner, Ian ;
Arulnathan, Vivek ;
Li, Yang ;
Zargar Ershadi, Shiva ;
Smart, Alyssa ;
Pelletier, Nathan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (01) :168-180