The Science for Profit Model-How and why corporations influence science and the use of science in policy and practice

被引:74
作者
Legg, Tess [1 ]
Hatchard, Jenny [1 ]
Gilmore, Anna B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bath, Dept Hlth, Tobacco Control Res Grp, Bath, Avon, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
COMMERCIAL DETERMINANTS; SOUND SCIENCE; PUBLIC-HEALTH; TOBACCO; INDUSTRY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FRAMEWORK; HISTORY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0253272
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Science has been at the centre of attempts by major industries, including tobacco, chemical, and pharmaceutical, to delay progress in tackling threats to human and planetary health by, inter alia, obscuring industry harms, and opposing regulation. Some aspects of this influence are well documented, others remain poorly understood, and similarities between industries remain underexplored. This study, therefore, aims to synthesise the literature to develop an evidence-based typology and model of corporate influence on science in order to provide an overview of this multi-faceted phenomenon. We obtained literature examining corporate attempts to influence science and the use of science in policy and practice from: database searches, bibliographies, expert recommendations, and web alerts; using a modified scoping review methodology (n = 68). Through interpretive analysis we developed the Science for Profit Typology and Model. We identified eight corporate sectors repeatedly engaging in activities to influence science, including: manipulation of scientific methods; reshaping of criteria for establishing scientific "proof"; threats against scientists; and clandestine promotion of policy reforms that increase reliance on industry evidence. The typology identifies five macro-level strategies used consistently across the eight industries, comprising 19 meso-level strategies. The model shows how these strategies work to maximise the volume, credibility, reach, and use of industry-favourable science, while minimising these same aspects of industry-unfavourable science. This creates doubt about harms of industry products/practices or efficacy of policies affecting industry; promotes industry-favoured policy responses and industry products as solutions; and legitimises industry's role as scientific stakeholder. These efforts ultimately serve to weaken policy, prevent litigation, and maximise use of industry products/practices-maximising corporate profitability. We provide an accessible way to understand how and why corporations influence science, demonstrate the need for collective solutions, and discuss changes needed to ensure science works in the public interest.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   The intersections of industry with the health research enterprise [J].
Akl, Elie A. ;
Khamis, Assem M. .
HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2019, 17 (1)
[2]  
Arksey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI [DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616, 10.1080/1364557032000119616, https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616]
[3]  
Azoulay David, 2015, Lowest Common Denominator: How the Proposed EU-US Trade Deal Threatens to Lower Standards of Protection From Toxic Pesticides
[4]   Legislating "sound science": The role of the tobacco industry [J].
Baba, A ;
Cook, DM ;
McGarity, TO ;
Bero, LA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2005, 95 :S20-S27
[5]   Public Health, Academic Medicine, and the Alcohol Industry's Corporate Social Responsibility Activities [J].
Babor, Thomas F. ;
Robaina, Katherine .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 103 (02) :206-214
[6]   Alcohol research and the alcoholic beverage industry: issues, concerns and conflicts of interest [J].
Babor, Thomas F. .
ADDICTION, 2009, 104 :34-47
[7]   Assessing the health impact of transnational corporations: its importance and a framework [J].
Baum, Frances E. ;
Sanders, David M. ;
Fisher, Matt ;
Anaf, Julia ;
Freudenberg, Nicholas ;
Friel, Sharon ;
Labonte, Ronald ;
London, Leslie ;
Monteiro, Carlos ;
Scott-Samuel, Alex ;
Sen, Amit .
GLOBALIZATION AND HEALTH, 2016, 12
[8]  
Bero L., 2013, TOBACCO IND MANIPULA
[9]  
Bero L.A, 2010, STANDFORD LAW POLICY, V21
[10]  
Bero LA, 2013, 12013 EA