A comparison between different methods of calculating average engine emissions for agricultural tractors

被引:15
|
作者
Hansson, PA
Lindgren, M
Norén, O
机构
[1] Dept Agr Engn, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Swedish Inst Agr Engn, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
来源
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH | 2001年 / 80卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1006/jaer.2001.0710
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
High-quality data on average specific and absolute emissions from agricultural tractors are needed in calculations of environmental loads caused by different food production techniques and agricultural strategies, but the standards used to calculate these data are not adapted to agricultural conditions. Correct data on typical average engine loads are also important when optimizing engine control systems. The purpose of this work was to calculate average specific emission values in g kWh(-1) and average absolute emission values in g h(-1) for a 70 kW tractor using different methodologies and to compare the results. The results show that the average specific hydrocarbon (HC) and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions calculated by European and international standards are lower than the specific emissions calculated from the average use of a 70 kW tractor, especially for tractors partly used for low-load operations and front loading. When studying the absolute amount of emissions, the results instead show that nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions are overestimated if calculated according to the standards. The study also indicates that results calculated according to a non-standardized five-point test cycle developed in Germany are more representative for all-round use of tractors in the 50-75 kW range than results from European and international standards. Further, the results show that it is not possible to design one set of weighting factors that gives representative results for all types of agricultural tractors and work operations. (C) 2001 Silsoe Research Institute.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 43
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Influences on gasoline engine performance and emissions of different in-cylinder dilution methods
    Tang, Qi-Jun
    Liu, Jing-Ping
    Wang, Yong
    Xia, Xiao-Lang
    Zhou, Feng
    Neiranji Gongcheng/Chinese Internal Combustion Engine Engineering, 2015, 36 (02): : 38 - 44
  • [22] Reexamining the dissolution of spent fuel: A comparison of different methods for calculating rates
    Hanson, BD
    Stout, RB
    SCIENTIFIC BASIS FOR NUCLEAR WASTE MANAGEMENT XXVIII, 2004, 824 : 89 - 94
  • [23] Performance and emissions comparison between Avgas, ethanol and ETBE in an aircraft engine
    Johnson, G
    Shauck, M
    Zanin, G
    ADVANCES OF ALCOHOL FUELS IN THE WORLD, 1998, : 252 - 257
  • [24] Study on comparison of different methods to calculating sensitivity index of Jensen model
    WANG Kequan FU Qiang JI Fei XU Shuqin College of Water Conservancy and Building Engineering
    Journal of Northeast Agricultural University(English Edition), 2007, (03) : 278 - 282
  • [25] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF CALCULATING STOPPING POWERS FOR HEAVY-IONS
    HUBNER, K
    PRETZSCH, G
    KERNENERGIE, 1979, 22 (01): : 28 - 31
  • [26] Comparison of Different Methods of Calculating CT Radiation Effective Dose in Children
    Newman, Beverley
    Ganguly, Arundhuti
    Kim, Jee-eun
    Robinson, Terry
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 199 (02) : W232 - W239
  • [27] Comparative analysis between different methods for calculating on-board ship's emissions and energy consumption based on operational data
    Moreno-Gutierrez, Juan
    Pajaro-Velazquez, Emilio
    Amado-Sanchez, Yolanda
    Rodriguez-Moreno, Ruben
    Calderay-Cayetano, Fatima
    Duran-Grados, Vanesa
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 650 : 575 - 584
  • [28] Comparison of different dilution methods for measuring diesel particle emissions
    Lyyränen, J
    Jokiniemi, J
    Kauppinen, EI
    Backman, U
    Vesala, H
    AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 38 (01) : 12 - 23
  • [29] Radiated emissions measurements: Comparison between different sites
    Ballesio, F.
    Giunta, M.
    Lavezzaro, L.
    Borio, G.
    Borsero, M.
    Lombardo, G.
    Pozzolo, V.
    CSELT Technical Reports, 2000, 28 (04): : 507 - 514
  • [30] Comparison of performance and emissions of a CRDI diesel engine fuelled with biodiesel of different origin
    Duda, Kamil
    Wierzbicki, Slawomir
    Smieja, Michal
    Mikulski, Maciej
    FUEL, 2018, 212 : 202 - 222