A comparison between different methods of calculating average engine emissions for agricultural tractors

被引:15
|
作者
Hansson, PA
Lindgren, M
Norén, O
机构
[1] Dept Agr Engn, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Swedish Inst Agr Engn, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
来源
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH | 2001年 / 80卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1006/jaer.2001.0710
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
High-quality data on average specific and absolute emissions from agricultural tractors are needed in calculations of environmental loads caused by different food production techniques and agricultural strategies, but the standards used to calculate these data are not adapted to agricultural conditions. Correct data on typical average engine loads are also important when optimizing engine control systems. The purpose of this work was to calculate average specific emission values in g kWh(-1) and average absolute emission values in g h(-1) for a 70 kW tractor using different methodologies and to compare the results. The results show that the average specific hydrocarbon (HC) and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions calculated by European and international standards are lower than the specific emissions calculated from the average use of a 70 kW tractor, especially for tractors partly used for low-load operations and front loading. When studying the absolute amount of emissions, the results instead show that nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions are overestimated if calculated according to the standards. The study also indicates that results calculated according to a non-standardized five-point test cycle developed in Germany are more representative for all-round use of tractors in the 50-75 kW range than results from European and international standards. Further, the results show that it is not possible to design one set of weighting factors that gives representative results for all types of agricultural tractors and work operations. (C) 2001 Silsoe Research Institute.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 43
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spatial dependence of noise in different agricultural tractors engine revolutions
    Spadim, Emanuel Rangel
    Marasca, Indiamara
    Batistuzzi, Murilo Martins
    Denadai, Marcelo Scantaburlo
    Sebastiao Guerra, Saulo Philipe
    REVISTA DE AGRICULTURA NEOTROPICAL, 2015, 2 (03): : 29 - 33
  • [2] An environmental comparison of techniques to reduce pollutants emissions related to agricultural tractors
    Bacenetti, Jacopo
    Lovarelli, Daniela
    Facchinetti, Davide
    Pessina, Domenico
    BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2018, 171 : 30 - 40
  • [3] Comparison of predicted refractive outcomes between different methods of toric IOL calculating methods
    Nakano, Shinichiro
    Hiraoka, Takahiro
    Oshika, Tetsuro
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2019, 60 (09)
  • [4] Comparison between different methods of calculating Kt/V as the marker of adequacy of dialysis
    Fazl-e-Mateen
    Ahmad, Sajad
    Elahi, Irfan
    Anees, Muhammad
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 38 (01) : 167 - 171
  • [5] Comparison of different methods for calculating usual intake
    Andersen, Elisabeth Wreford
    Biltoft-Jensen, Anja
    ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2015, 67 : 226 - 226
  • [6] Comparison of Different Methods for Calculating Medication Exposure
    Boudreau, Denise
    Chubak, Jessica
    Stang, Paul
    Wirtz, Heidi
    Key, Dustin
    VonKorff, Michael
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2011, 20 : S309 - S309
  • [7] Comparison of six different methods for calculating traveltimes
    Leidenfrost, A
    Ettrich, N
    Gajewski, D
    Kosloff, D
    GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 1999, 47 (03) : 269 - 297
  • [8] Expressing Uncertainty in Dental Age Estimation: A Comparison between Two Methods of Calculating the "Average" Standard Deviation
    Draft, Derek
    Lucas, Victoria S.
    McDonald, Fraser
    Andiappan, Manoharan
    Roberts, Graham
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2019, 64 (05) : 1506 - 1509
  • [9] COMPARISON OF SMOKE EMISSIONS IN DIFFERENT COMBUSTION ENGINE FUELS
    Angelovic, Michal
    Jablonicky, Juraj
    Tkac, Zdenko
    Angelovic, Marek
    ACTA TECHNOLOGICA AGRICULTURAE, 2020, 23 (04) : 201 - 207
  • [10] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR CALCULATING THE ENERGY OF DISPERSION INTERACTION
    RABINOVICH, YI
    CHURAEV, NV
    COLLOID JOURNAL OF THE USSR, 1984, 46 (01): : 54 - 60