Effects of load carriage and footwear on lower extremity kinetics and kinematics during overground walking

被引:29
作者
Dames, Kevin D. [1 ]
Smith, Jeremy D. [2 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Coll Cortland, Dept Kinesiol, 1164 Profess Studies Bldg, Cortland, NY 13045 USA
[2] Univ Northern Colorado, Sch Sport & Exercise Sci, Campus Box 39, Greeley, CO 80639 USA
关键词
Barefoot; Shod; Walking gait; Loading; METABOLIC COST; SPEED; KNEE;
D O I
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.09.012
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Kinetic and kinematic responses during walking vary by footwear condition. Load carriage also influences gait patterns, but it is unclear how an external load influences barefoot walking. Twelve healthy adults (5 women, 7 men) with no known gait abnormalities participated in this study (age = 23 +/- 3 years, height = 1.73 +/- 0.11 m, and mass = 70.90 +/- 12.67 kg). Ground reaction forces and 3D motion were simultaneously collected during overground walking at 1.5 m s(-1) in four conditions: Barefoot Unloaded, Shod Unloaded, Barefoot Loaded, and Shod Loaded. Barefoot walking reduced knee and hip joint ranges of motion, as well as stride length, stance time, swing time, and double support time. Load carriage increased stance and double support times. The 15% body weight load increased GRFs 15%. Walking barefoot reduced peak anteroposterior GRFs but not peak vertical GRFs. Load carriage increased hip, knee, and ankle joint moments and powers, while walking barefoot increased knee and hip moments and powers. Thus, spatiotemporal and kinematic adjustments to walking barefoot decrease GRFs but increase knee and hip kinetic measures during overground walking. The ankle seems to be less affected by these footwear conditions. Regardless of footwear, loading requires larger GRFs, joint loads, and joint powers. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 211
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] The effect of military load carriage on ground reaction forces
    Birrell, Stewart A.
    Hooper, Robin H.
    Haslam, Roger A.
    [J]. GAIT & POSTURE, 2007, 26 (04) : 611 - 614
  • [2] Blacker S.D., 2009, Medicina Sportiva, V13, P116, DOI DOI 10.2478/v10036-009-0018-1
  • [3] Effects of load carriage and footwear on spatiotemporal parameters, kinematics, and metabolic cost of walking
    Dames, Kevin D.
    Smith, Jeremy D.
    [J]. GAIT & POSTURE, 2015, 42 (02) : 122 - 126
  • [4] Lower limb joint kinetics in walking: The role of industry recommended footwear
    Keenan, Geoffrey S.
    Franz, Jason R.
    Dicharry, Jay
    Della Croce, Ugo
    Kerrigan, D. Casey
    [J]. GAIT & POSTURE, 2011, 33 (03) : 350 - 355
  • [5] How do load carriage and walking speed influence trunk coordination and stride parameters?
    LaFiandra, M
    Wagenaar, RC
    Holt, KG
    Obusek, JP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2003, 36 (01) : 87 - 95
  • [6] Basic gait and symmetry measures for primary school-aged children and young adults whilst walking barefoot and with shoes
    Lythgo, Noel
    Wilson, Cameron
    Galea, Mary
    [J]. GAIT & POSTURE, 2009, 30 (04) : 502 - 506
  • [7] THE EFFECT OF CARRIED LOADS ON THE WALKING PATTERNS OF MEN AND WOMEN
    MARTIN, PE
    NELSON, RC
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 1986, 29 (10) : 1191 - 1202
  • [8] Effect of augmented plantarflexion power on preferred walking speed and economy in young and older adults
    Norris, James A.
    Granata, Kevin P.
    Mitros, Melanie R.
    Byrne, Erica M.
    Marsh, Anthony P.
    [J]. GAIT & POSTURE, 2007, 25 (04) : 620 - 627
  • [9] Comparison of gait with and without shoes in children
    Oeffinger, D
    Brauch, B
    Cranfill, S
    Hisle, C
    Wynn, C
    Hicks, R
    Augsburger, S
    [J]. GAIT & POSTURE, 1999, 9 (02) : 95 - 100
  • [10] Biomechanical and metabolic effects of varying backpack loading on simulated marching
    Quesada, PM
    Mengelkoch, LJ
    Hale, RC
    Simon, SR
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 2000, 43 (03) : 293 - 309