List Equivalency of PRESTO for the Evaluation of Speech Recognition

被引:11
作者
Faulkner, Kathleen F. [1 ,2 ]
Tamati, Terrin N. [1 ]
Gilbert, Jaimie L. [3 ]
Pisoni, David B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Speech Res Lab, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[2] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, DeVault Otol Res Lab, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Commun Disorders, Stevens Point, WI 54481 USA
关键词
speech perception; speech recognition; speaker variation; individual differences; TIMIT; cochlear implants; SPOKEN-WORD RECOGNITION; HEARING-IMPAIRED LISTENERS; COCHLEAR IMPLANT USERS; AZBIO SENTENCE LISTS; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; INFORMATIONAL MASKING; DISCRIMINATION SCORES; STIMULUS VARIABILITY; NONNATIVE LISTENERS; TALKER VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.3766/jaaa.14082
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Background: There is a pressing clinical need for the development of ecologically valid and robust assessment measures of speech recognition. Perceptually Robust English Sentence Test Open-set (PRESTO) is a new high-variability sentence recognition test that is sensitive to individual differences and was designed for use with several different clinical populations. PRESTO differs from other sentence recognition tests because the target sentences differ in talker, gender, and regional dialect. Increasing interest in using PRESTO as a clinical test of spoken word recognition dictates the need to establish equivalence across test lists. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to establish list equivalency of PRESTO for clinical use. Research Design: PRESTO sentence lists were presented to three groups of normal-hearing listeners in noise (multitalker babble [MTB] at 0 dB signal-to-noise ratio) or under eight-channel cochlear implant simulation (CI-Sim). Study Sample: Ninety-one young native speakers of English who were undergraduate students from the Indiana University community participated in this study. Data Collection and Analysis: Participants completed a sentence recognition task using different PRESTO sentence lists. They listened to sentences presented over headphones and typed in the words they heard on a computer. Keyword scoring was completed offline. Equivalency for sentence lists was determined based on the list intelligibility (mean keyword accuracy for each list compared with all other lists) and listener consistency (the relation between mean keyword accuracy on each list for each listener). Results: Based on measures of list equivalency and listener consistency, ten PRESTO lists were found to be equivalent in the MTB condition, nine lists were equivalent in the CI-Sim condition, and six PRESTO lists were equivalent in both conditions. Conclusions: PRESTO is a valuable addition to the clinical toolbox for assessing sentence recognition across different populations. Because the test condition influenced the overall intelligibility of lists, researchers and clinicians should take the presentation conditions into consideration when selecting the best PRESTO lists for their research or clinical protocols.
引用
收藏
页码:582 / 594
页数:13
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] Bell T S, 2001, J Am Acad Audiol, V12, P514
  • [2] Bench J, 1979, Br J Audiol, V13, P108, DOI 10.3109/03005367909078884
  • [3] Bentler R A, 2000, Am J Audiol, V9, P84, DOI 10.1044/1059-0889(2000/010)
  • [4] STANDARDIZATION OF A TEST OF SPEECH-PERCEPTION IN NOISE
    BILGER, RC
    NUETZEL, JM
    RABINOWITZ, WM
    RZECZKOWSKI, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1984, 27 (01): : 32 - 48
  • [5] STARR: A Speech Test for Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Auditory Prostheses Under Realistic Conditions
    Boyle, Patrick J.
    Nunn, Terry B.
    O'Connor, Alec Fitzgerald
    Moore, Brian C. J.
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2013, 34 (02) : 203 - 212
  • [6] Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: Talker-, listener-, and item-related factors
    Bradlow, AR
    Pisoni, DB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1999, 106 (04) : 2074 - 2085
  • [7] Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English
    Clarke, CM
    Garrett, MF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2004, 116 (06) : 3647 - 3658
  • [8] Dirks D D, 2001, J Am Acad Audiol, V12, P233
  • [9] Acoustic simulations of combined electric and acoustic hearing (EAS)
    Dorman, MF
    Spahr, AJ
    Loizou, PC
    Dana, CJ
    Schmidt, JS
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2005, 26 (04) : 371 - 380
  • [10] ARTICULATION TESTING METHODS
    EGAN, JP
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 1948, 58 (09) : 955 - 991