Resilience Assessment: A Performance-Based Importance Measure

被引:1
作者
Nouri Qarahasanlou, Ali [1 ]
Zamani, Ali [2 ]
Barabadi, Abbas [3 ]
Mokhberdoran, Mahdi [4 ]
机构
[1] Imam Khomeini Int Univ, Fac Tech & Engn, Qazvin 3414896818, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran, Coll Engn, Tehran 9813, Iran
[3] UiT Arctic Univ Norway, Dept Technol & Safety, N-6050 Tromso, Norway
[4] SGS, Tabriz 51368, Iran
关键词
reliability; importance measure; operational condition; frailty model; fleet of loading system; RELIABILITY; FRAILTY;
D O I
10.3390/en14227575
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The resilience of a system can be considered as a function of its reliability and recoverability. Hence, for effective resilience management, the reliability and recoverability of all components which build up the system need to be identified. After that, their importance should be identified using an appropriate model for future resource allocation. The critical infrastructures are under dynamic stress due to operational conditions. Such stress can significantly affect the recoverability and reliability of a system's components, the system configuration, and consequently, the importance of components. Hence, their effect on the developed importance measure needs to be identified and then quantified appropriately. The dynamic operational condition can be modeled using the risk factors. However, in most of the available importance measures, the effect of risk factors has not been addressed properly. In this paper, a reliability importance measure has been used to determine the critical components considering the effect of risk factors. The application of the model has been shown through a case study.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Ali N.G., 2015, P CIVILICA IST TURK
[2]   Identifying the mixed effects of unobserved and observed risk factors on the reliability of mining hauling system [J].
Allahkarami, Zeynab ;
Sayadi, Ahmad Reza ;
Ghodrati, Behzad .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEM ASSURANCE ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 12 (02) :281-289
[3]   Component importance measures for interdependent infrastructure network resilience [J].
Almoghathawi, Yasser ;
Barker, Kash .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 133 :153-164
[4]  
Amrutkar KP, 2017, INT J MATH ENG MANAG, V2, P150, DOI 10.33889/IJMEMS.2017.2.3-014
[5]   Reliability modelling incorporating load share and frailty [J].
Asha, G. ;
Raja, A. Vincent ;
Ravishanker, Nalini .
APPLIED STOCHASTIC MODELS IN BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY, 2018, 34 (02) :206-223
[6]   A Holistic View of Health Infrastructure Resilience before and after COVID-19 [J].
Barabadi, Abbas ;
Ghiasi, Mohammad Hossein ;
Qarahasanlou, Ali Nouri ;
Mottahedi, Adel .
ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-ABJS, 2020, 8 :262-269
[7]   Maintainability analysis considering time-dependent and time-independent covariates [J].
Barabadi, Abbas ;
Barabady, Javad ;
Markeset, Tore .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2011, 96 (01) :210-217
[8]  
Barabadi R, 2019, J Model Eng, V0, DOI [10.22075/jme.2019.17837.1721, DOI 10.22075/JME.2019.17837.1721]
[9]   Spare-part management in a heterogeneous environment [J].
Barabadi, Reza ;
Ataei, Mohammad ;
Khalokakaie, Reza ;
Qarahasanlou, Ali Nouri .
PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (03)
[10]   Availability allocation through importance measures [J].
Barabady, Javad ;
Kumar, Uday .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2007, 24 (06) :643-+