Characteristics and outcomes of small abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database

被引:15
作者
Bellamkonda, Kirthi S. [1 ]
Nassiri, Naiem [1 ]
Sadeghi, Mehran M. [2 ]
Zhang, Yawei [3 ]
Guzman, Raul J. [1 ]
Chaar, Cassius Iyad Ochoa [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Vasc Surg & Endovascular Therapy, New Haven, CT USA
[2] Yale Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Cardiovasc Med, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Aneurysm repair; Clinical outcomes; Endovascular repair; Ruptured aortic aneurysm; RISK-FACTORS; SURVEILLANCE; REPAIR; EXPANSION; DIAMETER; IMPACT; SIZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2021.01.063
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The current guidelines recommend elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair at 5.5 cm for men and 5.0 cm for women. However, rupture can occur in patients with an aneurysm smaller than these size thresholds. In the present study, we investigated the proportion of AAAs that rupture at sizes less than elective operative thresholds and compared the outcomes of repair with those of aneurysms that had ruptured at a larger size. Our hypothesis was that the rupture of small AAAs carries mortality similar to that of rupture at larger sizes. Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted vascular files for open AAA repair and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) were reviewed for all cases of ruptured AAAs (rAAAs) from 2011 to 2018. The patients were divided into two groups: those with small AAAs that had ruptured at a size less than the current size guidelines for elective repair and those with large AAAs that had ruptured at a size that had met the criteria for elective repair. Univariate analyses were conducted to compare the comorbidities and perioperative outcomes of infrarenal rAAA repair between the groups. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to examine the differences in mortality between small and large rAAAs after controlling for confounding variables. Results: Of the 1612 rAAA repairs,167 (10.4%) were small rAAAs. The proportion of small rAAAs did not significantly change during the study period (P = .15). The large rAAA group was more likely to have juxtarenal or suprarenal aneurysms compared with the small rAAA group (27% vs 16%; P= .001). A comparison of infrarenal rAAAs only demonstrated that the mean small rAAA (n =141) diameter was 4.1 cm in the women and 4.5 cm in the men compared with the large rAAAs (n = 1051), with a mean diameter of 7.1 cm in women and 8.3 cm in men (P< .01 for the women; P < .01 for the men). The patients in the small rAAA group had had a significantly lower body mass index but were more likely to be African American and to have hypertension. The small rAAA group was more likely to present without hypotension and to have undergone EVAR. The repair of small rAAAs was associated with lower bleeding and mortality and a shorter mean operative time but with more readmissions. Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated that size was not associated with outcome after adjusting for other variables. Conclusions: Of all AAA repairs classified as treating rupture, 10% were for patients with small AAAs. Patients with small rAAA were less likely to present with hypotension and were more likely to have undergone EVAR. Further research into sac morphology and more sensitive imaging modalities might help identify small rAAAs at high risk of rupture that would benefit from elective repair.
引用
收藏
页码:729 / 737
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Abouleish A.E., 2015, ASA Newsletter, V79, P38
[2]  
Aggarwal S, 2011, EXP CLIN CARDIOL, V16, P11
[3]   Family history of aortic aneurysm is an independent risk factor for more rapid growth of small abdominal aortic aneurysms in Japan [J].
Akai, Atsushi ;
Watanabe, Yoshiko ;
Hoshina, Katsuyuki ;
Obitsu, Yukio ;
Deguchi, Juno ;
Sato, Osamu ;
Shigematsu, Kunihiro ;
Miyata, Tetsuro .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 61 (02) :287-290
[4]  
American College of Surgeons, 2015, USER GUIDE 2015 ACS
[5]   Abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion - Risk factors and time intervals for surveillance [J].
Brady, AR ;
Thompson, SG ;
Fowkes, FGR ;
Greenhalgh, RM ;
Powell, JT .
CIRCULATION, 2004, 110 (01) :16-21
[6]   Risk factors for aneurysm rupture in patients kept under ultrasound surveillance [J].
Brown, LC ;
Powell, JT .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1999, 230 (03) :289-296
[7]   Comparison of Surveillance Versus Aortic Endografting for Small Aneurysm Repair (CAESAR): Results from a Randomised Trial [J].
Cao, P. ;
De Rango, P. ;
Verzini, F. ;
Parlani, G. ;
Romano, L. ;
Cieri, E. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 41 (01) :13-25
[8]   The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm [J].
Chaikof, Elliot L. ;
Dalman, Ronald L. ;
Eskandari, Mark K. ;
Jackson, Benjamin M. ;
Lee, W. Anthony ;
Mansour, M. Ashraf ;
Mastracci, Tara M. ;
Mell, Matthew ;
Murad, M. Hassan ;
Nguyen, Louis L. ;
Oderich, Gustavo S. ;
Patel, Madhukar S. ;
Schermerhorn, Marc L. ;
Starnes, Benjamin W. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 67 (01) :2-+
[9]   VARIABLES THAT AFFECT THE EXPANSION RATE AND OUTCOME OF SMALL ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSMS [J].
CRONENWETT, JL ;
SARGENT, SK ;
WALL, MH ;
HAWKES, ML ;
FREEMAN, DH ;
DAIN, BJ ;
CURE, JK ;
WALSH, DB ;
ZWOLAK, RM ;
MCDANIEL, MD ;
SCHNEIDER, JR .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1990, 11 (02) :260-269
[10]  
CRONENWETT JL, 1985, SURGERY, V98, P472