Incorporating PROMIS Symptom Measures into Primary Care Practice-a Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:43
作者
Kroenke, Kurt [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Talib, Tasneem L. [2 ]
Stump, Timothy E. [4 ]
Kean, Jacob [5 ]
Haggstrom, David A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
DeChant, Paige [2 ]
Lake, Kittie R. [2 ]
Stout, Madison [2 ]
Monahan, Patrick O. [4 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Div Gen Internal Med & Geriatr, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Regenstrief Inst Hlth Care, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[3] Vet Affairs Hlth Serv Res & Dev Ctr Hlth Informat, Indianapolis, IN USA
[4] Fairbanks Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Indianapolis, IN USA
[5] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
patient-reported outcomes; symptoms; primary care; feedback; clinical trial; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; MINIMALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES; SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS; PHYSICAL SYMPTOMS; COMMON SYMPTOMS; CANCER-PATIENTS; PAIN; DEPRESSION; ANXIETY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-018-4391-0
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Symptoms account for more than 400 million clinic visits annually in the USA. The SPADE symptoms (sleep, pain, anxiety, depression, and low energy/fatigue) are particularly prevalent and undertreated. To assess the effectiveness of providing PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System) symptom scores to clinicians on symptom outcomes. Randomized clinical trial conducted from March 2015 through May 2016 in general internal medicine and family practice clinics in an academic healthcare system. Primary care patients who screened positive for at least one SPADE symptom. After completing the PROMIS symptom measures electronically immediately prior to their visit, the 300 study participants were randomized to a feedback group in which their clinician received a visual display of symptom scores or a control group in which scores were not provided to clinicians. The primary outcome was the 3-month change in composite SPADE score. Secondary outcomes were individual symptom scores, symptom documentation in the clinic note, symptom-specific clinician actions, and patient satisfaction. Most patients (84%) had multiple clinically significant (T-score ae<yen> 55) SPADE symptoms. Both groups demonstrated moderate symptom improvement with a non-significant trend favoring the feedback compared to control group (between-group difference in composite T-score improvement, 1.1; P = 0.17). Symptoms present at baseline resolved at 3-month follow-up only one third of the time, and patients frequently still desired treatment. Except for pain, clinically significant symptoms were documented less than half the time. Neither symptom documentation, symptom-specific clinician actions, nor patient satisfaction differed between treatment arms. Predictors of greater symptom improvement included female sex, black race, fewer medical conditions, and receiving care in a family medicine clinic. Simple feedback of symptom scores to primary care clinicians in the absence of additional systems support or incentives is not superior to usual care in improving symptom outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1245 / 1252
页数:8
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] A controlled trial of methods for managing pain in primary care patients with or without co-occurring psychosocial problems
    Ahles, Tim A.
    Wasson, Jobn H.
    Seville, Janette L.
    Johnson, Deborah J.
    Cole, Bernard F.
    Hanscom, Brett
    Stukel, Therese A.
    McKinstry, Elizabeth
    [J]. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2006, 4 (04) : 341 - 350
  • [2] Effect of the addition of a "help" question to two screening questions on specificity for diagnosis of depression in general practice: diagnostic validity study
    Arroll, B
    Goodyear-Smith, F
    Kerse, N
    Fishman, T
    Gunn, J
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 331 (7521): : 884 - 886A
  • [3] Anxiety but Not Social Stressors Predict 12-Month Depression and Pain Severity
    Bair, Matthew J.
    Poleshuck, Ellen L.
    Wu, Jingwei
    Krebs, Erin K.
    Damush, Teresa M.
    Tu, Wanzhu
    Kroenke, Kurt
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2013, 29 (02) : 95 - 101
  • [4] Depression and pain comorbidity - A literature review
    Bair, MJ
    Robinson, RL
    Katon, W
    Kroenke, K
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 163 (20) : 2433 - 2445
  • [5] Barsevick Andrea M, 2007, Semin Oncol Nurs, V23, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.soncn.2007.01.009
  • [6] Overall Survival Results of a Trial Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes for Symptom Monitoring During Routine Cancer Treatment
    Basch, Ethan
    Deal, Allison M.
    Dueck, Amylou C.
    Scher, Howard I.
    Kris, Mark G.
    Hudis, Clifford
    Schrag, Deborah
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 318 (02): : 197 - 198
  • [7] Symptom Monitoring With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Routine Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Basch, Ethan
    Deal, Allison M.
    Kris, Mark G.
    Scher, Howard I.
    Hudis, Clifford A.
    Sabbatini, Paul
    Rogak, Lauren
    Bennett, Antonia V.
    Dueck, Amylou C.
    Atkinson, Thomas M.
    Chou, Joanne F.
    Dulko, Dorothy
    Sit, Laura
    Barz, Allison
    Novotny, Paul
    Fruscione, Michael
    Sloan, Jeff A.
    Schrag, Deborah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (06) : 557 - +
  • [8] MINIMALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES FOR PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROMIS) FATIGUE AND PAIN INTERFERENCE SCORES
    Beaumont, J. L.
    Fries, J. F.
    Curtis, J. R.
    Cella, D.
    Yun, H.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (03) : A165 - A166
  • [9] Does providing feedback on patient-reported outcomes to healthcare professionals result in better outcomes for patients? A systematic review
    Boyce, Maria B.
    Browne, John P.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2013, 22 (09) : 2265 - 2278
  • [10] Brown LF, 2009, PSYCHOSOMATICS, V50, P440, DOI 10.1176/appi.psy.50.5.440