Functional status examination: A new instrument for assessing outcome in traumatic brain injury

被引:81
|
作者
Dikmen, S
Machamer, J
Miller, B
Doctor, J
Temkin, N
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Rehabil Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Neurol Surg, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
functional status; measurement development; outcome assessment; psychometric properties; psychosocial; quality of life; traumatic brain injury;
D O I
10.1089/08977150150502578
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
The Functional Status Examination (FSE) is a new measure designed to evaluate change in activities of everyday life as a function of an event or illness, including traumatic brain injury. The measure covers physical, social, and psychological domains. The FSE is based on a structured interview and includes levels of functioning that accommodate the full spectrum of possible outcomes, from death through recovery to preinjury functioning. Based on 133 prospectively studied patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury, the FSE has favorable psychometric properties including good test-retest reliability (r = 0.80) and close correspondence of assessments provided by the patient and their significant other (SO; r = 0.80). The FSE correlated significantly with each of three severity indices with closest relationships occurring between the FSE assessed by the SO and posttraumatic amnesia (r = 0.76). The FSE assessed by the SO was significantly (p < 0.05) more closely related to each severity index than the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) or Sickness Impact Profile and, for two of the three indices, than the SF-36. All measures showed significant change from 1 to 6 months after injury with the FSE showing the largest effect sizes. The FSE is significantly related to important constructs such as family burden, SO depression, and sacrifices the family makes, as well as overall indices of recovery and satisfaction with level of functioning. The latter relationships are significantly stronger than for the GOS. The FSE has demonstrated good reliability, validity, and sensitivity, and appears to be a promising instrument for monitoring recovery and assessing functional status in clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 140
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Post-traumatic amnesia and its relationship to the functional outcome of people with severe traumatic brain injury
    Kosch, Y.
    Browne, S.
    King, C.
    Fitzgerald, J.
    Cameron, I.
    BRAIN INJURY, 2010, 24 (03) : 479 - 485
  • [42] Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Functional Outcome in Older Adults: Pain Interference But Not Cognition Mediates the Relationship Between Traumatic Injury and Functional Difficulties
    Hume, Camilla H.
    Mitra, Biswadev
    Wright, Bradley J.
    Kinsella, Glynda J.
    JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2023, 38 (04) : E278 - E288
  • [43] Functional Status, Chronic Stress, and Cortisol Response After Mild-to-Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury
    Bay, Esther
    Sikorskii, Alla
    Gao, Fuli
    BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH FOR NURSING, 2009, 10 (03) : 213 - 225
  • [44] Assessing and treating veterans with traumatic brain injury
    French, Louis M.
    Parkinson, Glenn W.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 64 (08) : 1004 - 1013
  • [45] Attenuated traumatic axonal injury and improved functional outcome after traumatic brain injury in mice lacking Sarm1
    Henninger, Nils
    Bouley, James
    Sikoglu, Elif M.
    An, Jiyan
    Moore, Constance M.
    King, Jean A.
    Bowser, Robert
    Freeman, Marc R.
    Brown, Robert H., Jr.
    BRAIN, 2016, 139 : 1094 - 1105
  • [46] Exploration of a new tool for assessing emotional inferencing after traumatic brain injury
    Zupan, Barbra
    Neumann, Dawn
    Babbage, Duncan R.
    Willer, Barry
    BRAIN INJURY, 2015, 29 (7-8) : 877 - 887
  • [47] A new clinical tool for assessing social perception after traumatic brain injury
    McDonald, S
    Flanagar, S
    Rollins, J
    Kinch, J
    JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2003, 18 (03) : 219 - 238
  • [48] Traumatic brain injury brief outcome interview
    Burton, LA
    Leahy, DM
    Volpe, B
    APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 10 (03): : 145 - 152
  • [49] Cognitive Outcome Following Traumatic Brain Injury
    Dikmen, Sureyya S.
    Corrigan, John D.
    Levin, Harvey S.
    Machamer, Joan
    Stiers, William
    Weisskopf, Marc G.
    JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2009, 24 (06) : 430 - 438
  • [50] Prediction of outcome in severe traumatic brain injury
    Menon, David K.
    Zahed, Cameron
    CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2009, 15 (05) : 437 - 441